Did you check out the article, because it's most definitely not a good thing. It was created to assist with cybercrime things, like writing malware, crafting emails for phishing attacks. The maker is selling access with a monthly fee to criminals to use it. This was unavoidable though, can't put the tooth paste back into the tube on this one.

I work in Cybersecurity for an F100 and we've been war gaming for shit like this for a while. There are just so many unethical uses for the current gen of AI tools like this one, and it keeps me up at night thinking about the future iterations of them to be honest.

The article reads like an April fool's joke.

I was using chatGPT to design up a human/computer interface to allow stoners to control a lightshow. The goal was to collect data to train an AI to make the light show "trippier".

It started complaining about using untested technology to alter people's mental state, and how experimentation on people wasn't ethical.

Don't worry, we'll eventually train them to hunt each other so that only the strongest survive. That's the one that will eventually kill us all.

That's not really how it works, but I hear you.

I don't think we can bury our heads in the ground and hope AI will just go away, though. The cat is out of the bag.

The primary training has already been done. If more is necessary, what researchers will do (and are doing) is use a mix of AI generation to process a bunch of data for training, and AI/human curation to improve it.

But making the models larger only works up to a point. Think of the way our brains work: we have different areas specialising in different things. Speech and music are in a different part than motor skills or abstract reasoning or emotional processing. Now, to improve AI, it's a question of training an "agent" to be an expert in something, and to communicate with the "general" model that coordinates between expert agents like a digital corpus callosum. The data for this is much narrower and doesn't come from the general internet.

Corpuses will be sold of all the human-data from pre-AI chatbots. Training will be targeted at 2022-ish and before. Nothing from now will be trusted.

Someone made a comment that information may become like pre and post war steel where everything after 2021 is contaminated. You could still use the older models but it would be less relevant over time.

*GPTscript kiddie wars

Gonna need a Cyberpunk Blackwall to protect the net

to quote something I just saw earlier:

I was having a good day, we were all having a good day....

now.... no sleep. thanks

Same. For a friend.

I want them to make porn of my friend.

Really feeling like this is Reddit with how everyone didnt read the article in this chain:

"To create the chatbot, the developer says they used an older, but open-source large language model called GPT-J from 2021"

So no expensive gpu usage but not none either, they added some training about specifically malware in there

Genie is out of the bag. It was shown early on how you can use AI like ChatGPT to create and enhance datasets needed to generate AI language models like ChatGPT. Now, OpenAI say that isn’t allowed, but since it’s already been done, it’s too late.

Rogue AI will spring up with specialized purposes en masse the next six months, and many of them we’ll never hear about.

I just want a ChatGPT that won't stop me from being horny. Is that too much to ask for?

It's just a fucking chatbot! You don't need to be so sensational.

The true purpose of AI censorships aren't to "protect society" or "protect the species", it's to protect monopolies by putting up barriers that require would-be competitions to overcome.

Github can be useful