GenZedong

4300 readers

206 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Doomerism and its consequences (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

People who claim to have gone from a "Marxist"(which I doubt they ever had a real understanding of) to anarchist don't make any sense. Do these people think ignoring the national and global level of the problem will better address it? Do they think the oligarchy won't equally quell your pitiful attempt at anarchism with tanks and artillery the same as any other attempt to break free of the system?

How could anyone think anarchism could address climate change more effectively when it's incapable of removing the capitalist system from power as we see throughout history?

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Embracing chauvinism because left wing geopolitics are too controversial

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah no shot someone understands Marxism and then "leaves" it. Especially not to anarchism.

I can sympathize with the hope getting dimmer, it really is dire. But the nihilistic "let's do nothing and bask in sadness while the world burns" is just dumb. I'd rather go out trying.