this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
119 points (100.0% liked)

Formula 1

8921 readers
102 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
🇳🇱 Netherlands 23-25 Aug
🇮🇹 Italy 30 Aug-01 Sep
🇦🇿 Azerbaijan 13-15 Sep
🇸🇬 Singapore 20-22 Sep
🇺🇸 United States 18-20 Oct
🇲🇽 Mexico 25-27 Oct
🇧🇷 Brazil 01-03 Nov
🇺🇸 United States 21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A class action lawsuit has been filed against the Formula One Las Vegas Grand Prix in relation to fans being forced to leave Thursday’s practice session after an hourslong delay.

Dimopoulos Law Firm and co-counsel JK Legal & Consulting filed the suit Friday in Nevada District Court on behalf of 35,000 fans who purchased tickets to Thursday’s practice run, the legal firms announced Saturday.

Just nine minutes after Thursday’s’s practice session began, a water valve cover came loose and damaged multiple F1 drivers’ vehicles. That led to a 2 ½ hour delay, with a 90-minute second practice session beginning at 2:30 a.m. Friday.

Fans were forced by police and security officers to leave at 1:30 a.m. Friday and weren’t able to watch the session.

The defendants named in the lawsuit are Liberty Media Corporation, doing business as Formula One Heineken Silver Las Vegas Grand Prix and TAB Contractors, Inc. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, negligence and deceptive trade practices against the defendants.

“We will vindicate the rights of the fans that traveled great distances and paid small fortunes to attend, but were deprived of the experience,” Dimopoulos Law Firm owner and lead attorney Steve Dimopoulos said in a statement.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Who didn't see this coming? You can see this coming from a mile away.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Yup. To be fair they should have refunded them on the spot. Because then Liberty Media could easily stand up to them in court and would not have to reimburse traveling costs.

But as it stands, they will lose most likely, and end up paying far more.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Good luck, pretty sure the rained out spa attendees haven’t gotten a refund for that shitshow.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That was a different jurisdiction and different corcumstances, so not Sure that sets a precedenr

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

Also bad weather is pretty much the definition of an act of God. Not properly securing the track surface isn't.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Believe many were offered tickets to the following years race either free or discounted heavily. Might be mistaken tho

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

@JJROKCZ I think about half have never received refunds nor discounted tickets

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Oof that’s embarrassing then, they need to get that sorted immediately

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

Welcome to America, bitches!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Well that was quick

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I hear the phrase "class action lawsuit" mentioned on the internet all the time, does it actually mean anything at this early point or is it just some chancers trying their luck? Basically is there any point in paying this story any attention unless it goes to court?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is just the concept of the proceeding and one of the things, where i consider the US justice system to be better than many European systems. It is a "class action", because there is many people, where both the claim and the conditions are the same. So it makes sense to make one suit for everyone instead of an individual suit every time, as the decision should be the same among all suits.

It does not mean, that it is more severe or not. If there wouldn't be class action, imagine the headline "35.000 civil suits opened against F1 Las Vegas Grand prix."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thanks! I am aware of the concept and it does seem like a useful tool, but my point was more: is the opening of the lawsuit actually news, or do they usually go nowhere? Or in other words should we wait until it actually gets to court before reporting on it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Of course it should be reported now. There is people who were affected and need to know about the lawsuit, so they can decide to join in on it. It needs to be in public attention, so that both sides are pressured to play fairly, in particular the F1, since companies in the US love to play ressource games at court.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You need to discover its existence yourself and manually join it? Do the legal people not make an effort to find everyone they're supposed to be representing?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How would they know that you have been there that day and how to contact you? The F1 surely wont hand out the list of qll customers who purchased a ticket and i am not sure if it would be even legal. In my country it wouldnt be legal for sure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

In a class action lawsuit, identifying everyone who bought tickets is part of discovery. F1 will have to provide a list and it is up to the plaintiff to reach out to those people and get them to sign on. Even if someone doesn't participate, they're still entitled to any damages. It's pretty common to get a $20 check for a service you may have used a decade ago that settled a class action lawsuit, even if you never heard of it before. I just got one from Zoom for anti-competitive practices during COVID.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

No idea, I guess publicising it makes sense

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I am curious, how many fans were still there at 1:30? At one point the tv presenting showed people being asked to leave and there wasn’t a stack of people left several hours after p1 was cancelled. Made me wonder whether if they were incapable of keeping all stadiums staffed, could they have funnelled the remaining people, if not too many, to the main grandstand (or say two) and closed all the others.

I do feel for the people but, especially those that may have only had tickets to day 1. Even those with 3 days missed out, wasted a day off work, etc, as a result.

It happens though…Spa 2021 being another similar situation where the crowd wasn’t necessarily ejected, but they didn’t see what they’d come for either.