this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
977 points (79.2% liked)

Fediverse

28519 readers
762 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you're a server admin, please defederate Meta's domain "threads.net"

If you don't run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate "threads.net".

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 272 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Yeah dude let’s just federate with an instance maintained by a corporation that has undoubtedly caused a genocide in Myanmar by turning a blind eye to a far-right hate speech group that caused an entire fucking minority to flee into another country.

I don’t get why people are supporting and saying “oh it must be up to the user” like bro this is the company we’re dealing with. Fuck that fuck threads fuck zuckerberg i don’t want his shit cancer near something that’s going well so far.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Israel have been successfully pressuring meta to remove and shadow ban accounts sympathetic to Palestinians. The level of censorship is crazy.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 11 months ago (7 children)

OK, I'll bite. You got something more substantial than "I read it on the internet" to back that up? One reputable source on your accusation? Not sayin' you're lying/wrong, just asking for some verifiable proof.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Numerous actual popular accounts and news sources have been suspended. It was major news in the Arabic-speaking world in October. Meta even apologized for auto-translating Palestinian as “terrorist.”

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago (15 children)

If they want to hang out with us, they can make an account somewhere other than thread, bam, done!

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 125 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

lemm.ee already made the decision, based off of the voice of the community to defederate from Threads

[–] [email protected] 39 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy.Ca admins blocked Threads about 5 months ago: https://lemmy.ca/comment/901551

You can confirm that Threads dot net is still blocked by Lemmy.Ca by going to https://lemmy.ca/instances and clicking on the "Blocked Instances" tab.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 106 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (15 children)

please take a look at the replies under zuck's own post in threads.net and determine if that's the type of content you want.

for those who don't want to visit, majority of the commentators are bots. some advertising crypto, and others asking for money.

even if you think you can individually block those accounts, keep in mind the size of threads compared to fediverse.
for Lemmy: monthly active users are barely ~~150K~~40K, while for threads it's 100 million. there's no chance you can control that inflow of bots.

and if it still doesn't convince you, you can read threads' privacy policy, which states that they'll gather all that pii if you interact with their content.

most of the internet is already bigtech, I don't want Lemmy to become another arm of it. though I have faith in my instance maintainer and dessalines, the dev.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 11 months ago (12 children)

Comment stolen from user "copygirl" from blahaj.zone:

Looks like they'll be harvesting your data if you follow anyone from Threads, maybe even injecting ads. Unsure what happens to the data of people that get followed by a Threads user. A large part of the fediverse is here precisely because they want to escape corporate meddling, data-hoarding, advertising and other anti-user malpractices. There's a number of people talking about this, here's a recent post that highlights some of the things from their TOS.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 89 points 11 months ago (27 children)

Let users decide because we’re fucking adults.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Great thing about the fediverse

People get to decide what they want from their platform

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 11 months ago (16 children)

Yeah dude let’s just federate with an instance maintained by a corporation that has undoubtedly caused a genocide in Myanmar by turning a blind eye to a far-right hate speech group that caused an entire fucking minority to flee into another country.

I don’t get why people are supporting and saying “oh it must be up to the user” like bro this is the company we’re dealing with. Fuck that fuck threads fuck zuckerberg i don’t want his shit cancer near something that’s going well so far.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Then go join threads.net? Nobody's stopping you from doing that. That would put you on a server friendly to your beliefs.

Server admins also have opinions, and are not required to take a democratic vote and each individual user's choice into account. They can decide for themselves, and they will, for good or ill. If you don't like where it ends up, your user decision should be to fuck off to threads.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 11 months ago (7 children)

In favor of defederation. If I start seeing garbage from threads in my feed, I'm switching instances. I don't want Meta pushing their divisive, hateful, misinformation all up in my feeds. Meta will kill fedi. We don't need them.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] rottingleaf 77 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (22 children)

If anybody remembers XMPP being widespread and what Facebook, Google, Apple and others (say, I personally remember VK and Yandex in Russia supporting it) did to it, that's what will happen if you "wait and see".

EDIT: oh, half the thread is such comments

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 11 months ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Currently, I think there are two main branches of ActivityPub implementations: Microblogs(Mastodon and its forks, the microblog portion of kbin), which are user centric, and group based aggregators(Lemmy, Kbin, peertube, future Pixelfed), both of which are valid implementations, however, they don't really work well with each other.

So, I believe that the threat of Threads to Lemmy instances is really overblown for the simple reason that there is no way for a Lemmy user to browse microblog contents through federation to begin with, whether it be Mastodon or Threads.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 11 months ago (9 children)

If anything meta integrates here I'm out.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Let's not defederate from every corporate player. Some of them can probably respect reasonable rules of civility.

But fuck Meta. We already know how this plays out.

We know there's a huge wave of hatred and misinformation incoming. We've seen it on their other platforms.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We should avoid making blanket demands like this to the fediverse as a whole. I happen to support your position, but we should take into account the diverse nature of the social web.

Instead of making demands, explain your reasoning and leave each community to make up their own mind. This is the beautiful nature of the social web; we have broken decision making down into many smaller units instead of one mega instance/corporation.

Find a community that resonates with your own thinking on this issue, and over time a thousand different servers will gather experiences and a picture will start to form; was federation with Meta a good or a bad thing?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 11 months ago (23 children)

Okay. I’ve seen stuff like this on both mastodon, and here, but i haven’t heard about them doing anything that would actually harm the fediverse. I guess i don’t know what the problem is. I know they’ve got a negative reputation, and for good reason, but isn’t that the awesome part of threads being federated? We can follow and connect to people there without being part of their system, and therefor not susceptible to their bs? If I’m missing something please fill me in.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 11 months ago (17 children)

It is inevitable that Meta will try to kill the fediverse while chasing profits, there is no other possibility in their endgame.

If that is pushing ads into other instances or killing those instances entirely we don’t know yet but it will happen.

It has to because the shareholders must always have more.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 months ago (15 children)

Just think:

Meta has literal billions of users.

The entire fediverse has about 1.5 million.

Less than a fraction of a percent.

Why in THE FUCK would meta notice, or care, at fucking all? The entire fediverse of traffic ported over to meta wouldn't budge their advertising bottom line.

But, it's a comparatively small group of smart people, having conversations, and profiles they don't have tabs and near total control over.

There's news about cop city and gaza I have seen here that I've seen NOWHERE else.

Don't let them control the narrative here

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 11 months ago (5 children)

There's a list of people that have agreed to block it at https://fedipact.online/

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago (5 children)

0.19 allows users themselves to block instances...

[–] [email protected] 47 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The posts, not comments by the users on other instances posts

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago (12 children)

How about users make decisions for themselves and block Threads if they want?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Threads' size will unaviodably disrupt the Fediverse if they federate fully, regardless their intentions. I think the appropriate approach is making interaction opt-in, like social.coop does: https://social.coop/@eloquence/111588877096843391

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›