this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
136 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

57435 readers
3396 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Don't mean to be a negative Nancy, but I'll believe it when I see it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Is whatever he was holding in the video a good enough "it"? Or, like, a consumer product going all the way to market?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Remember last year when whoever came out and said they'd made a room temperature superconductor (LK99) and than other scientists tried to recreate it and it turned out to be false?

I'll believe it when it's verified by a lot of other people and not the inventor.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I agree that it should be verified, but given that it was published on Nature gives hope that it will be reproducible.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by embattled physicist

(not LK99, but they’re not infallible).

Let’s wait until we see peer confirmation.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Also given that it's from GA Tech, I'd expect it to be credible.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Not quite I guess, that wafer is what's needed for chip making but from reading the paper it looks like they were just trying to figure out how to make the band gap of the graphene just the right size. It says their next step is trying to adapt silicon chip making techniques to this new material. Terracing I guess to start?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I second this! Gimme the end product!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Likely not scalable on an industrial level, as always.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Crazy that it's transparent. I wonder how thick that wafer is.

Also awesome:

we're using properties of electrons that are not accessible to silicon

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If it's a single sheet of graphene.... about 1.5 angstrom thick.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How does he not cut himself while holding it?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We've been studying and perfecting the art of silicon semiconductors and silicon electronics manufacturing for over 70 years now, it'll take a while until this tech is anywhere near ready for applications. I'm not convinced you can do conventional CMOS on these things.

However, this is really cool and I'd love to work on graphene semiconductors!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Give it time someone will have it running doom

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

What is the significance of semiconductors in chatbot technology?How do semiconductors enhance chatbot capabilities?Can chatbots powered by semiconductors understand and respond to human emotions?What role do semiconductors play in voice-based interactions with chatbots?

Tips: the datasheet (https://www.icdrex.com/the-future-of-communication-chatbots-powered-by-semiconductors/) may help you a little.