188
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Apple refuses to relax its iron grip on iPhones in Europe::As its walled garden crumbles, Apple grudgingly allows EU users to sideload applications. Will regulators take stiffer action, and what about the US?

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 37 points 5 months ago

I think many of us anticipated Apple’s malicious compliance. Now we see if the EU really will hold them to account. I’m tentatively optimistic but I admit I’ll be very disappointed if Apple wins this. It will cement their position of power globally as untouchable, and that’s a terrible outcome for the whole world. I am very disappointed that the EU permitted Apple to declare iOS as distinct from all other mobile operating systems. They even permitted them to exclude iPadOS as a Core Platform Service. Just that decision alone now excludes all Apple TVs, iPads, the Vision, and Watch. I hope that decision is also revisited.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Surely Apple knows the EU won't look kindly on this at all?

They know this won't work long term. This is just a last-ditch attempt to keep an effective status quo for another year or so while the EU comes up with a response. Another year, possibly more, of fleecing their customers/developers.

Scummy behaviour. But what else would you expect from a massive tax-dodging multinational?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure this serves two purposes: to not leave money on the table (as terrible as that sounds, the non-EU market is still milkable for them), and to prepare investor sentiment for the inevitable loss of revenue in a year or so.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

The best use-case for an Apple product is you get money when you return it.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

Stable resale value is indeed a great perk of an iPhone when compared to phones running Android.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

If this isn't violating the DMA then the DMA is stupid. Legislation should limit the company's control, not force it into a specific action while allowing it to maintain as much control as possible.

In other words the DMA should effectively say "you don't get to choose how your platform is used", not "you get to make the rules, but just don't be the only one who can develop for your platform".

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Who cares, if you dont like apple dont buy apple. the only way apple effects me is these annoying articles.

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
188 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

55962 readers
3425 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS