this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
168 points (95.2% liked)

World News

38237 readers
2627 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Better to die in an instant than the alternative.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I really didn't care too much about what was going on until last night when I realized the horror of sitting in a metal tube, knowing you probably won't be rescued with a ticking timer of when your resources would run out. It seems like the perfect horror movie but irl. I hope implosion was the cause because the alternative has cause my brain to go into a full panic / existential mode and I am just an observer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Especially considering that one of the alternatives was, because the sub is bolted in from the outside, they could have been bobbing on the surface, suphocating.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (15 children)

I just can’t understand why ANYONE with that much money wouldn’t be a little more careful about where they choose to take risk. A little investigation on their part would have turned up the previous safety concerns.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One thing you can't buy with money is intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except that you can: you hire intelligence. He paid people to build it and fired them when they weren't comfortable with the design and had safety concerns. Lol

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I don't know anything about this guy, so take my pet theories with a pinch of salt, but...

  1. In my experience, people who think of themselves as entrepreneurs are often simply bad at perceiving risk. They start out with a certain hubris that is a product of this deficiency in assessing risk. Many of them will be taken down by this, but others will get lucky.

  2. When they get lucky, these people tend not to notice the element of luck but ascribe their success wholly to their smarts and hard work. This can lead to an inflated sense of how good one's judgement is.

  3. It can also lead to a lack of humility. It takes both good judgement and humility to know when to defer to someone else's judgement. These people had hubris to start with, and their success can compound this to the point where they consider themselves the best judge of everything. Then they stop listening to people who may know better than them.

  4. They also have the power to surround themselves with yes-men, so they are challenged less and less as time goes on.

Maybe this guy wasn't like that, but his comments about safety measures being a waste, his disregard for safety standards in constructing this submarine, and the way he fired the employee who complained that the sub was unsafe, suggest he may have been in this mold.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my experience, people who think of themselves as entrepreneurs are often simply bad at perceiving risk. They start out with a certain hubris that is a product of this deficiency in assessing risk. Many of them will be taken down by this, but others will get lucky.

specifically, you don't hear much about those unlucky

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The 19-year-old reportedly told family he was terrified. It was Father's Day and his father is very interested in the Titanic, so he went anyway. He was just trying to impress and relate to his father.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

With the current news surfacing (so to speak) about neglect and dismissal of safety concerns by the owner, that lawsuit is potentially going to be massive.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This is, admittedly, news to me. As someone who served on a submarine in the Navy I know first hand how serious neglect is. It can, and has in this case, kill everyone. It's not slow either. If you are negligent about anything for even a second everyone is dead. It's just a shame the person/people responsible also took innocent life. Preventable and inexcusable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oceangate is broke with no assets. There's nothing to sue.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (8 children)

You know, if I were ever to go down to the depth of the ocean with my friends and family on board to see the Titanic, I would make sure that the vehicle I'm riding in is overbuilt for safety and that everything that could go wrong is considered beforehand.

Why take any risk at all? With the amount of money that they had they could have hired an entire crew of an actual submarine for a day or two.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most submarines/submersibles can't actually get that deep, and of the few that can, some are government run and others are already on other projects.

What made OceanGate's Titan unique is that they were selling expeditions to the Titanic.

Now with all that said, if I had the disposable income to take on such an expedition, $250k sounds way too cheap/good to be true. Unfortunately in this case it was indeed too good to be true.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

OceanGate was skirting safety protocols with the Titan.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They understood the risks; there is no question in my mind that they didn't. I think they were bored with what life could offer them with that much money. At a certain point you really can basically experience it all. Instead of going on a tested rocket ship; they gambled the ultimate wager. Their life or bragging rights. Image the tale you could tell coming back from the journey in such a rigged tube; or the publicity of your fatal demise and making a "historical" moment regarding it. The world was watching. Darkly their death reads better than any final service of passing or headstone does.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There’s something inherently dangerous about rare, exclusive experiences. When millions of people do something, like fly commercial, you know it’s going to be pretty safe. When you find yourself going for an experience that only 6 people have ever had, ever, your danger warnings should be going off.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know a lot of people (not here necessarily) have been commenting on how these were rich people, but regardless of their financial situation they were just people first. I don't know anything about them and that being the case I'm going with this being a tragedy. I feel for the families that were left behind.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

TBH what gets me angry is the fact literally less than a week before the single biggest sea faring tragedy that hit the Mediterranean sea, and easily one of the top 20 straight up sea tragedy in recent memory happened and literally nobody gave nor is giving a shit.

A boat full of migrants sunk between Greece and Italy, 80 have been confirmed dead, more than 500 are missing, and the worst is, the boat was being surveilled the entire time by Frontex and the Greek coast guard who straight up lied (or chose not to see) the distress the ship was in.

I can understand people lashing out at the death of rich people driven largely by their hubris and trusting a downright irresponsible psycho. In some way its a shadenfreude-like feeling over the overt and indirect violence that average people experience compared to that of the rich. It's distasteful to be sure, but it is what it is. In an unjust society both the exploitor and the exploited are pushed to brutish, revengeful, detached feelings towards one another and broader ressentiment. The solution is the end of exploitation.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (15 children)

You're correct. I feel far worse for the refugees than the billionaires in the sub. But that being said i feel awful for the 19 year old on that ship. I know i would have said yes too because how many people can say "im going on holiday to the titanic" sounds great in concept. He may have been a rich kid but still a kid.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't wait for the Internet Historian video in a few years.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I think he would be more interested in covering the Reddit story - he is the internet historian after all.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Am curious how long this has been there and whether perhaps the "banging" was not related whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I believe they confirmed in the press conference the bangs were not related due to where the debris was found.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the debris sites indicate the implosion happened relatively soon after descent because the debris had drifted very far away from the Titanic. If they had descended deeper, the implosion would have been closer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I really hope that the sub imploded during the descent, and they've been dead all this time. Rather than the hull giving out after they sat on the ocean floor for days.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I heard the banging sound happened at 30 minute intervals for a while, but also the banging sounds could've been from one of the many search boats that were searching near the acoustic bouy

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

At least they didn't have to suffer for any stretch of time, I hope.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

According to submariners in other communities, the worst part would be any period of time where they knew they were sinking. That could be an hour of slowly falling from periscope depth or no time at all if the hull failed at a deep enough depth. The water forms a piston much like one in a truck engine that compresses the air enough to cause combustion. Any of the three things in that nano second will kill you before your body can process the information. The water hammer, the pressure shift, and the implosion all occur too quickly for the nerves to transmit the information.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Before wreckage found: We hear banging every 30 minutes

After wreckage found: We heard a big pop on Sunday

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

So, I understand that because water is not compressible, animals without air in their bodies are safe at such high pressures in the deep sea, but what I'm wondering is what would it look like if a human in the deep sea was suddenly exposed to those pressures, as would happen if a submarine rapidly pressurizes? I know the lungs would collapse and whatnot because the air would be pressurized into I'm guessing a liquid, like how propane sloshes when under pressure in a tank, but what else? What causes the instant death? Maybe the water shoots into nose/mouth so fast it acts like a bullet and applies a bunch of force to the walls internally?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

These are styrofoam cups that've been crushed by the pressure at the bottom of the ocean. The water isn't looking for your nose, it'd just crush your outsides into your insides until you hit a relative density, like the cup, but not as pretty. The air in your lungs would instantly compress and heat to several thousand degrees C, turning your insides back into your outsides. I think.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

If it was truly a rapid implosion as described by the Navy, then the whole thing will have crumpled like a steam implosion in which case, everyone inside is likely immediately dead from blunt force trauma.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

During the implosion you’ll have to contend with the walls of the sub and the water rushing it at a high percentage of mach 1 if not at supersonic speeds. That includes shards of carbon fibre and the big heavy titanium end plates. The air bubble inside will also be compressed to well above 400 atmospheres as the inertia of the incoming water causes an over pressure scenario. This compression heats up that air bubble to temperatures were a plasma is formed and for a brief moment the imploding sub would be the only visible light source down there. Basically anyone in there at the time is converted to a red mist. Think A-train running through that chick at the start of the boys, or that kid flying through that sheriff in brightburn for an idea of the result.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Anyway, what did everybody have for lunch today?

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›