It's part of the reason you don't see the lemmy.world instance in the lemmy server browser.
On join-lemmy.org you mean? I didn't know that, but that's great to see. Lemmy.world has become pretty big.
5dh
joined 1 month ago
I very much agree. But what if a very important Lemmy community is on a server that decides to allow sponsored content or something similar, it'll be hard for the community to move. Maybe Lemmy should implement tools for moving communities when it's necessary.
Even if, for instance, Threads was widely allowed to federate with Mastodon servers?
What in the world is a Monero listing?
Good correction, thanks
Right, then Signal might not be the best option. The NSA can easily track who’s using Signal, and possibly do some traffic correlation to reveal who’s talking to who.
But to state that there is no privacy on Signal at all is a bit of a stretch.
Depends, who do you want to shield what information from? Signal knows all of their users’ phone numbers. You can hide it from other Signal users. All depends on your threat model.
Honest question, are you still using Telegram after all the recent news following Durov's arrest? Do you view the service differently?
I get your point. But we’d probably adjust if there’s less releases, I think. More choice might not be better when it comes to the planet and it’s natural resources. And we’re now at a point where phones barely change when compared to the year before.
If there’s a new iPhone every two years, you can still decide when the improvements justify upgrading for you.
What really helps is that fediverse users are quite aware of the ideology behind federated social networks. I think, indeed, they won't all stay on a server that is federated with Threads if it threatens the fedi network.