That's a pretty tough question because at different times in my life I would have given opposite responses.

Hanging, for an opinion? That seems pretty un-libertarian, doesn't it?

"Maximise your reading potential" is even worse! "Read more" should suffice. Let's not use negative words either, let's keep it double plus good here... It should be "read more easy words", nothing more nothing less.

It's called hackthebox not hackoutofthebox

It should be a basic requirement of literally any public office. That fact that we have got this far baffles me utterly.

Yeah I've been migrating away steadily. And what a shame! Now Google don't get to use my emails to train their shit AI.

There's a bit more to it than that

Pattern recognition is one thing that our brains do, it is a very long way away from the only thing our brains do.

I'd say if you have 80% of the requirements you might as well apply. I would frankly ignore years of experience more or less entirely.

It's not exactly uncommon for a listing to advertise the person they want, but to accept applicants with significantly less on the basis that they can get there. Nearly every job I've ever got I was not at the level advertised in something or other.

Couldn't disagree more. You'd miss out on such bangers as "Congratulations, you are being rescued. Please do not resist."

Diversity, equality, and inclusion.