BrikoX

<...> costs have ballooned from around £19 million to a projected estimate of £131 million and, because the council chose not to use system audit features, it cannot tell if fraud has taken place on its multibillion-pound spending budget for an 18-month period.

Sounds like fraud was the goal.

If you like worshiping capitalism and CEOs then sure. Bringing CEOs to talk about how workers are the problem is all that network does.

https://www.wicked.com/

Well, since they are cooperating with Dutch authorities, lying wouldn't be in their best self-interest. And so far nobody proven otherwise.

Random claims are not evidence.

EDIT: Same issue with AP article, no sources, just random unsourced quote.

The article included several unsourced quotes from some kind of chat groups which are also potentially translated, no way to verify. And then they included a random unsourced screenshot which has "translation" added on top it, removing original content that would help verify authenticity. That's not proof you claim it to be... Not only basic fact checking disproves it, but article itself quotes Uber spokesperson indicating there were no reports.

A story on how the claim that was rejected by Uber. And Israeli PR machine trying to make something out of nothing.

An Uber spokesperson tweeted saying they were “shocked to hear of this abhorrent violence” and were supporting Dutch authorities with their investigation.

They claimed, “there were no reported incidents of violence or antisemitism on the Uber app,” and did not respond to allegations that drivers perpetrated physical violence.

It's basically a roundabout way of funding religious charter schools since they can't be funded directly.

• Billions in taxpayer dollars now go to religious schools via vouchers
• Arizona is sending taxpayer money to religious schools — and billionaires see it as a model for the US
• Voucher expansion leads to more students, waitlists and classes for some religious schools

So include them in your post that otherwise just proves the point of the article?

Because that's the moderate/center position of the country. There is just a false impression created by the corporate media that you have to be "center right" to be considered moderate. Direct democracy is cool.

My bad, didn't catch the date as it came through my RSS feed.

It's definitely not universal net positive, but the votes she would have lost from Jews wouldn't matter so much as they are primarily based in non-swing states like California and New York. And she deliberately shit on Arabs during the whole campaign and the shitshow that was DNC. One can endlessly debate if those Arab voters made a right decision with not voting for her and instead casting votes for Jill Stein in protest. But considering what their only ask as arms embargo to comply with US own foreign aid policy which Biden administration is circumventing at the moment, it was easy pickings and Biden strategists she hired fucked her over.

You seem to misunderstand my point. I said that it was "dominated with single-issue voters", not that single-issue for everyone was Palestine.

Look at exit polls.