Delicious_Tomatoes

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I just had to find out what Moms for Liberty was. My life is a little worse for it, but at least their naming conventions have changed 0 since One Million Moms.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yep, the worst kind of story. "Be careful what you wish for, because you might get fine print."

Main characters: make wish Monkey's Paw: gives wish and something else Main characters: Oh, the problem was me wanting the reasonable thing, not that I trusted a really shady entity in asking for it! Me: May I leave this planet now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, it will crack soon....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

As an aircraft crew member, I can confirm: it is all vehicle types, it can be initiated by the vehicle or the ground person, and we all love it. Not really sure about the community size, it's not like I've ever known anyone I waved at.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

So many people going "opposite sex does X in relationships" and me just being like "you could stop dating people who do X" and they always look at me like I've sprouted horns. Like seriously, people who do X in relationships don't need to be enabled to continue uncriticized

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This was two posts down from a very funny video showing that you can get any result from a poll. Before I even read the numbers I was like "People, government, and violence-enacting groups are not the same" ie I can relate to (sympathize with) being a citizen of an occupying regime, even to being part of the occupying force, without agreeing with the overall agenda of the regime in charge. Maybe I'm empathizing instead of sympathizing, but I see most people who take polls on a CBS site (another obvious flaw here) will also sympathize (or empathize) that direction.

Then I read the numbers. They are abysmal. Still, I'd like to see a poll that is more fairly worded. A poll that constructs the opposite perspective in its audience would be amusing too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Uncritical, naive, gullible... no, I think credulous works fine there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I know Lemmy is tech heavy, and that still passed completely unnoticed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

ROFL! I'll see myself out.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just so long as we don't put them on "reserved" land that we shrink every year or two until we suddenly decide that we want to take it back etc. I think it would be just grand to get a bunch more Palestinians in Palestine! For Americans, anyway. Immigrants are good for the economy. The Palestinians themselves might have better luck elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know who the poster is. I was just nodding along like "Yes, that is true why is it a hot take"

view more: next ›