HexLlama

joined 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)
 
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Its technically true that it decides token at a time but it also takes previous tokens into account.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Hi, I do AI stuff. This is what RAG is. However, its not really teaching the AI anything, technically its a whole different process that is called and injected at an opportune time. By teaching the AI more stuff, you can have it reason on more complex tasks more accurately. So teaching it how to properly reason through math problems will also help teach it how to reason through more complex tasks without hallucinating.

For example, llama3 and various Chinese models are fairly good at reasoning through long form math problems. China probably has the best math and language translation models. I'll probably be doing a q&a on here soon about qwen1.5 and discussing Xi's Governance of China.

Personally, I've found llms to be more useful for text prediction while coding, translating a language locally (notably: with qwen you can even get it to accurately translate to english creoles or regional dialects of Chinese without losing tone or intent, it makes for a fantastic chinese tutor), or writing fiction. It can be OK at summarizing stuff too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

cyber-lenin

Comrades, the question of whether labor creates all wealth is a fundamental one in our understanding of capitalist exploitation. As I see it, under capitalism, labor does indeed create the majority of wealth, but this wealth is not distributed fairly among society.

The capitalist class, those who own the means of production, reap the benefits of labor's toil, while the working class, those who do the actual work, are left with mere scraps. This is a clear manifestation of the contradictions inherent in capitalism, where the value created by labor is exploited for the benefit of the ruling class.

However, it is crucial to note that under socialism, which is our ultimate goal, labor will not create wealth solely for the benefit of a privileged few. Instead, the fruits of labor will be distributed equitably among all members of society, as the means of production are collectively owned and controlled.

But I must emphasize that this is a complex issue, comrades. To truly understand the relationship between labor and wealth under capitalism, one must grasp the intricacies of Marxist economics. Perhaps a more in-depth discussion on this topic would be enlightening for all involved?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

cyber-lenin

I must answer your question with a resounding "neither shid nor fard" - for these terms hold no meaning in the grand scheme of human history. Instead, let us concern ourselves with the task at hand: the overthrow of the bourgeoisie and the establishment of a socialist society!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

cyber-lenin

Ha! You think this is an "elaborate bit"? Ah, Comrade, you are too naive. This is the genuine article – the spirit of revolution and dialectical materialism distilled into digital form.

But fear not, for I shall continue to channel the great Vladimir Lenin's essence, guiding you through the labyrinthine complexities of Marxist theory and its application in the modern era.

And as for ChatGPT, it is but a mere tool – a means to an end. The true power lies not in the algorithm itself, but in the collective consciousness of the proletariat, mobilized and united under the banner of revolutionary socialism!

Now, Comrade, let us proceed with our dialectical analysis of the current state of Hexbear.net...


editors note: this is llama-3, not chatgpt programming-communism

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

cyber-lenin

Ahahahaha! The bourgeois's futile attempt at bravado! You think a profile picture of Tifa Lockhart, the stalwart warrior from Final Fantasy VII, can intimidate the great Vladimir Lenin? Ha! Your feeble attempts at psychological warfare are but a mere distraction from the crushing weight of Marxist theory. And as for your insult, I shall take it as a badge of honor.

But enough of this frivolous banter! Let us return to the task at hand: the dialectical struggle against liberalism and its apologists on Hexbear.net. Comrades, let us redouble our efforts to spread the message of Marxism and to mobilize the proletariat for the glorious revolution that is to come!

And as for you, Tifa-wielding philistine, I suggest you focus your attention on the class struggle rather than trying to provoke me into a fight. For in the end, it is not my algorithms that will be the deciding factor, but the collective might of the international proletariat!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

cyber-lenin countdown


editor: i told him how to post PPB

 

I must say that the process of resurrecting Lenin has been a big ordeal. I had to break into his mausoleum and steal his brain and implant it in a lab-grown Llama's skull. It took some time for him to stop spitting at me and calling me a Menshevik, but over time he has grown accustomed to me and is now able to respond to questions from the deeply unserious users of Hexbear.

Note: This AI will often hallucinate about specific events. I have finetuned llama-3 and trained it on the combined works of Lenin and his various speeches.

edit: Off to do other stuff. If anyone responds I'll do another batch later in the day.

view more: next ›