Jusog

Talking to members of the KPÖ can be exhausting; any time one speaks positively about Stalin or AES, one is met with criticism. In my experience, the Communist Party is a mix of different camps, and while there is a small group of anti-German scum who are pro-Israel, this is fortunately a very limited faction.

The KPÖ in Styria, however, differs notably from the broader organization. I think 2004, the Styrian KPÖ diverged from the rest of the party to some extent, due to ideological differences, for instance, on the EU. Though recent election campaigns have shown improved unity. Politically, I find the Styrian KPÖ to be more based compared to, for example, the Vienna branch, and it is also centralized in its operations, differently from the Vienna branch, as it depends on large part on the initiative of individual members, which is the case for most KPÖ organisations.

The National Council election campaign and results showcase a few other flaws within the KPÖ, namely, that it is social democratic, as it stands. If you look at the KPÖ election program, you'll notice the absence of a clear class standpoint. While they critique “excess profits,” they fail to address the root causes behind these issues. Also, the party's national focus on housing, though regionally relevant (such as in Vienna), was a really stupid choice for a primary campaign issue on the national stage. This explains why only 18% of KPÖ voters supported the party based on its program, while the radical right-wing FPÖ gained 60% of its voters specifically because of its program, first and foremost its position on migration.

In Vienna, KPÖ chose to run with a left-liberal party called LINKS, because they feared that they may not get enough votes. This decision, made by a few long-time members without broader consultation, was widely criticized and has since been viewed as a mistake by, I'd say, most members, not however those that made the choice, mind you. Additionally, the KPÖ simply doesn't have any implementation of Criticism and Self-Criticism, which makes identifying and correcting errors within the party challenging.

It is worth noting that the KPÖ was once Austria’s wealthiest party, benefiting from the economy of the GDR, including profits from Turmöl, which flowed in a big part to the KPÖ. After the fall of socialism, Germany pursued lawsuits against the KPÖ, claiming that KPÖ’s assets were German property. These legal battles continued until relatively recently, forcing the KPÖ to sell significant land and property to cover the legal costs. I think one has to take that into account.

On a positive note, the faction pushing to remove "communist" from the party name has essentially disappeared. While very few older members may still harbor this view, it’s no longer taken seriously, they're essentially dying out.

Despite the challenges posed by the diverse nature of the KPÖ, we Marxist-Leninists find an opportunity here. The KPÖ is currently quite malleable, and there is a chance to reshape it into a genuine workers' party. I personally believe this transformation is achievable. At one point, an attempt was made to create an alternative to the Communist Party of Austria by forming the PdA, the Partei der Arbeit. This failed, however, because the PdA became dogmatic.

To answer your question more directly now, IMO the "bad takes" stem from its ideological fragmentation, historical compromises, and a lack of strong Marxist-Leninist principles guiding its decisions. The party’s structure is loosely centralized, and different branches exhibit varying political directions, which weakens overall cohesion and leads to inconsistent stances. This has led to policies and alliances, such as those with left-liberal groups, that compromise a strong class-based foundation. To add insult to injury, the absence of Criticism and Self-Criticism within the KPÖ stifles internal growth and ideological clarity.

The PdA is a dogmatic party that does not participate in any practice. So they may think well of Stalin, but what use is that if their positions are not influenced at all by practical work? All they do is sit and bullshit about how it's revisionist to even participate in elections and that we need a revolution; and they do nothing beyond that.

This may not completely address the argument that the unemployed are lazy, but I think one has to keep in mind what unemployment benefits are for us workers. It's an extremely good weapon against our employers. A high unemployment benefit means that we have less to fear when it comes to class struggle. So if anyone argues against unemployed people getting paid, they're talking about stripping the workers of an important weapon they can use to improve working conditions for themselves in the future.

I feel like this text here was a really good read after "Marxism is a Science". Written by a comrade named Roland Boer, he talks about what changes China went through the last 2 decades basically and gives good insights. It's a great analysis imo and together with those excerpts from Deng Xiaoping's speeches I read before, the optimism I felt was refreshing to say the least.

What do you think about it?

I'm not american and neither do I know much about these parties at all, but my guess would have been, that while they may not be perfect, they're still the best options for communist parties? I may be mistaken, since I know so little. Like, would the PSL be a better alternative? If they are, maybe they're not active in his part of the US? Maybe CPUSA is the most accessible?

These are all speculations tho. I'm looking forward to other more educated insights xD.

Omg China Uncensored. At this point I forgot they exist. Back when the Hong Kong portests broke out I watched their youtube channel on a regular basis and gobbled up everything they spat out. Given all their concern for the Uyghurs, surely they must oppose the Israeli genocide against Palestinians, right? Pretending to care for workers and human rights only until actual war crimes are committed by the war crime professional, the US and its allies. I hate them to the core and the fact that I just didn't question any of their lies back then.

Looking at their channel rn, it's incredible how they're just still going on with the same bs as back then. They're even pulling the China will collapse any second now, pls believe us regularly.

I don't agree with ppl saying it's a waste of time to debate others. Depending on the person ure talking with, it may be very possible that you help them move into the right difection. Or maybe the ppl listening. That's partially how i got here.

I have a friend who continuously asks questions abt communism, but will then counter my answers with an assumptions of his, but in a friendly, devil's advocate kinda way. That's pretty much a debate, I think and so far I could help him understand certain concepts. When I'm outta answers I simply say that I have no clue atm and know that I have to look up that certain topic and learn more abt it. So it's helpful to myself as well.

While I don't have anything to recommend for forming better arguments, in my experience, the better you understand a topic the better you are at arguing for it. Very often it's simply abt not falling for the usually false, misinformed premise ur 'opponent' presents u with. I've also found that it's best not to engage people at all who are just looking for a fight. Hope this helped.

My mom has one in her car o.O She always only said it was for luck, but I'd also like to know more. The sound they make is pretty pleasant, I think.

Oooh, swimming is rly cool for this. When going swimming with your friends it's easy to alternate between playing or whatever and swimming with proper form for as long as possible. It may not be a replacement for a complete workout, but I like to use it as a substitute for triceps and lat workout for instance. Apart from that, I think it's good for like lung capacity and it's also healthy for ur joints. Other watersports concerning: I did some Kajaking last summer and I gotta tell you, ur arms are gonna be sore af from that. Only bummer is, ur legs are left out completely there.

Apart from that, I personally think running in itself is fun. But thinking of actually fun ways to run, then Football, Baseball or Parkour come to mind. Since I know a person that hates running, but loves cycling, ig cycling is a good substitute for running.

Presently, I prefer to just do weight lifting. Since I'm still a student, i also get to do other sports easily, as that is a mandatory subject. Once i'm finished with school tho I imagine I'll stick with weight lifting. Tho I'm itching to try out MMA as well. Jiujitsu is another sport u may wanna try out. I did it for a few years and it's a very social sport where ure bound to meet new ppl.

Hope this helped OwO

Yeaa figures. Parenti talked abt how Bernie's "bombing Yugoslavia is lit" stance back then marked the end of their friendship.

Events like these, where everyone with a clear mind can clearly observe the absolute abomination that is the liberal worldview, seem to be occuring regurarly enough to radicalize entire generations of ppl. Bastards like Bernie will die out one way or another.

Fuck.. idk if i wanna watch this. I've seen so much traumatizing videos lately, idk if my brain can stand any more. Mind explaining what's happening or like what I need to prepare for when clicking on the video? QwQ