Lemmygradwontallowme

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 minutes ago

Damn you scared me 😨

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

feeling like starting a struggle session this morning

Oh yeah... well uh, fuck you then

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Had enough sleep last night?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Ohh... that effect... thought it'd be more whacky than that

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It's been long over due... but now it should be coming

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Most living women won't fetishise themselves like anime girls are fetishised

Ofc

And there is also the place, japan factor that has to be considered.

What is the Japan factor, I may ask, for example?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

When the army came to visit me, t'was in the early hours, with Merkavas, old cluster bombs, and Plasan Armored Cars

They thought they had me cornered but then I had them wrecked, with me armor-piercing rockets of me little Saegheh

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I forgot to mention, just to clarify, we're talking about David Gilmour, right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Edit: the industrialist is using 100 percent of the loan, in our example, to do the whole labor process. So the variable and constant capital are all part of the original sum, the surplus on 100 loaned to him would be 140%, if he owes 5% on the loan he pockets the other 35% himself. The variable capital isn't an additional sum on top, the loan can be used for constant and variable capital as money.

Oooh... that explains the 5% interest

So, overall, he borrows a serviced loan, possibly for constant and variable capital,

whose net price is = 5 (100 - 105 -> borrowed money - {future principal + future interest} ), but that which can help form the 40% value/ surplus value of the full 140%/ commodities

40 - 5 = 35 in profit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The rest of your points seem fine, though

The financier is paying 100 for 105, the industrialist is paying 105 for 120.

^Correction: 140 is the value of the commodties, 120 is merely the cost of constant and variable capital bought to make commodities

But just to reiterate my point, how does the industrial capitalist preserve his capital value of 120, while adding a surplus value of 20 onto it, despite the financial capitalist's taking of principal and sum?

Because it seems to me, that after the process of selling the commodities, the industrial capitalist has to deal with the following costs:

100 + 5 = principal + interest, taken by the money capitalist (note: the interest is derived from the surplus value created, due to 5% interest)

20 = variable capital paid

140 - 125 = 15

Leaving 15 to be the industrial capitalist's profit, of the original surplus value of 20.

However, a transformation from 120 capital --> 15 increase seems to me a decrease... to counter this, this would indicate some preservation of the initial capital used in production, to continue capitalist expansion.

TO make it so that 120 capital -> + 20 surplus value -> 140 capital

14
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/3586085

Jaunty little song

 

Jaunty little song

 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/3550558

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/43386174

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/20222393

Williams has condemned Israel’s defensive military operations in Gaza as a “war crime” and criticized the US Congress for inviting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to speak in July.

Williams issued a statement on Oct. 11 of last year, four days after Oct. 7, lamenteing the attacks before calling not to retaliate and shifting attention to oppression of Palestinians.

“We can, we have to be able to, at once grieve the hundreds of innocent lives taken in Israel, and oppose the escalating violence of retaliation, the endless war, the systemic violence and oppression of Palestinians too often ignored, excused, or condoned,” Williams wrote.

Good, at least make Zionchuds seethe

 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/43386174

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/20222393

Williams has condemned Israel’s defensive military operations in Gaza as a “war crime” and criticized the US Congress for inviting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to speak in July.

Williams issued a statement on Oct. 11 of last year, four days after Oct. 7, lamenteing the attacks before calling not to retaliate and shifting attention to oppression of Palestinians.

“We can, we have to be able to, at once grieve the hundreds of innocent lives taken in Israel, and oppose the escalating violence of retaliation, the endless war, the systemic violence and oppression of Palestinians too often ignored, excused, or condoned,” Williams wrote.

Good, at least make Zionchuds seethe

 

As far as I'm concerned, demcent is boiled down to "freedom of thought, unity of action", by Lenin

And I think this sort of thing kinda reminds me especially of the U.S duopoly but not exclusive to it

Unless there's something else to it and correct if I'm wrong?

I guess it seems it was coincidental for it to be termed by MLs, prolly becuz of the political necessity of action, yet ideological attachment, during a time of organizational chaos for Bolsheviks...

 
29
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Crossposted from Alsephina

Some nice final remarks

In his “Eight Rules and Insights on the Nature of War” Basil said: “every Palestinian (in the broad sense, meaning anyone who sees Palestine as a part of their struggle, regardless of their secondary identities), every Palestinian is on the front lines of the battle for Palestine, so be careful not to fail in your duty.” This is very reminiscent of Fanon’s understanding of Algerian as an inclusive revolutionary subjectivity, one that is available to anyone who chooses to participate in the liberation struggle , where “friends and enemies” are determined by what they do, not by who they are in terms of colonial constructions of race and identity. In this framing, Palestinian is not a racial or ethnic category, but a counteridentity available to anyone who participates in the struggle. In a lesser known piece that has yet to fully appear in English, Basil wrote: “I no longer see this as a conflict between Arabs and Jews, between Israeli and Palestinian. I have abandoned this duality, this naïve oversimplification of the conflict. I have become convinced of Ali Shariati and Frantz Fanon’s divisions of the world [into a colonial camp and a liberation camp (he clarifies in a footnote)]. “In each of the two camps, you will find people of all religions, languages, races, ethnicities, colors, and classes. In this conflict, for example, you will find people of our own skin standing rudely in the other camp, and at the same time you will find Jews standing in our camp.” If, as per Basil and Fanon, the broad resistance would be able to distinguish friends and enemies based on “the choices they make,” on their actions and commitments, rather than their identity and “race,” then counterinsurgent psychological operations that pit people against each other and diffuse collective action might be halted at the point of implementation, enabling a more resilient movement trajectory at the heart of Empire

 

Like, IDK, despite their political policy ultimately heading that of the foreign and economic policy of the west, they don't seem to be the type to resist if military conflict were to occur against them, and say, Hexbears win against them...

Perhaps we can use them as a sort of hollow government opposition to laugh at, and claim that "we're still a liberal democracy"

Whereas I can see right-libs (cons) at least having some sort of shoddy milita, if not military training, who would gladly fight for left-libs, like the Freikorps defending the Weimar Republic, and the Black Hundreds defending Kerensky's gov't

10
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

On my ~~scrolling~~ research on Hexbear, I've come across some of the following abbrassive figures against reactionaries: fedposting

Tankiedesantski (as of now, has not returned a month after he tried to justify the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, from a Chinese diaspora POV)

UlyssesT (awakened by Dirty Owl, still juiced up in his personal crusade against bazingabrains and Cali-cucks)

AlaskaBall (prolly making Lenin-esque dunk of the tailist CPUSA as we speak)

Polandisastateofmind (Lemmygradder, known for being the usual self-hating Pole and rightfully so)

RyanGosling (prolly Tankiedesantski's blood brother, in terms of VIBES, not necessarily political views)

frauddogg (stop changing display names, Lemmygradder, that being said, vehemently anti- cracker and prolly BlackRedGuard's personal alt )

  • Eric Blair
14
Taho (hexbear.net)
 

Filipino version of sweet douhua

spoilerSome microwaved silken tofu, some (admittedly storebought) sago pearls with brown sugar syrup


view more: next ›