That may have been true in the past in the US, but this three way split isn't helping us. There could be an opportunity here, alot people are just voting against the other guy.
MarxOverflow
joined 1 year ago
Couple of the candidates seem to be leaning in that direction.
It's hard to win because malice and disregard for the truth are often hard to prove, and loosing the case can be more damaging. It has however one of the few I ways I know of to convince people that reporters got it wrong.
The hit piece about rape from the NYT keeps getting cited, despite it's sources claiming their words were twisted.
They responded to "ceasefire now" with "four more years"...
I wonder if they realize how much it sounds like they want four more years of genocide. I wonder how many of them actually support the genocide.
I know that, you know that. It was absolutely disgusting.
However most people didn't really seem to care, and the language was a bit less genocidal.
Fewer people took a closer look because they just don't care about Ukraine. Americans are much more interested in Israel.
Americans also care more about it. So they do a bit more research. There's also the shear scale of it, the whole Russia/Ukraine thing also has a crazy complex history, not quite as simple as maybe don't support genocide.
Adl stands for all defamation league
We cannot be free until Palestine free. This the reason. The oppression of Palestine is the blueprint for oppression around the world.
Wiping out a military group is not the same as attacking civilians. Destroying military capability can bring peace, bombing civilians does not. Idf is military and its primary purpose appears to be the destruction of the Palestinians.
The only 2 candidates I'd consider voting for are Claudia De la Cruz and Jill Stein. I think I'm going to go with Jill because if I'm not mistaken, technically there is chance she could get the electoral votes needed to be elected. It's like 1 in a million though, but there's a chance.