N0N0

Funny thing is, have You ever seen any human having this kind of teeth naturally? No? Good coz nobody has, maybe (just maybe) as replacements but that would be the really cheap ones.

It was finished in 1880 but construction startet on the 15th of August in 1248.

I downvoted and You asked for the why and here it is: I'm also programmer and I have experienced aggressive behavior both, from women to men and the other way around but only between those that were close to each other (friends). I have never experienced the same behavior between colleagues that were not familiar to each other and also not from supervisors to lower grades.

I know that my experiences are just mine and others may have made others so the downvote is because You're assuming there's a structual problem where there is just your own personal experience. To round it up, I have not much respect for ppl who direct themselves to the victim role.

European Cathedrals (like the dome of cologne or the Hagia Sophia in istanbul), the Roman limes (great wall structures, plural), Roman aqueducts and the Colloseum, some later pyramides were designed by hellenistic architects (successors of Alexander the Great and his fellowers), further in the past come Stonehenge and other megalite structures, and many more - sadly lost - antique wonders of the world.

With its angles pointing to the left, it is a symbol of death but not neccessarily "bad". With its angles pointing to the right it is a symbol of life and luck for most countries of the world what is also not "bad".

Only for stupid ppl who only know about the nazis misusing it for their shitty ideology it is "bad", but this also only counts for a svastica with its angles pointing to the right.

E.g.: Was liebst du mehr, Mayonnaise oder mich?

What do You like better, Mayonnaise or me?

The point is, it's highly improper to not love a person in favor of a thing. Instead You can lighten it up a bit by just asking for what they like better.

The initial question is only askable among very close friends (Irony/Saracasm), usually not even for couples and definitely not for love interests or lose contacts.

I'm german and this phrase is utterly bs. Tbh, every German You will tell this will treat You like you're a retard.

It's not set up this way legally, it is set up this way because devs and sales commited to this practice. Still devs are trying to blame the customers for a problem that is clearly originated on the sales management side.

Btw. this is not about morality but about legality and the lack of responsibility at the sales-side, trying to play this card is just a sign of you going out of arguments and ... I wrote this already... does make your POV look yuck.

Anyways, appreciated our lil discussions so thx for your time, live long and prosper!

I never wrote that devs have access to cc information, but sales departement has. This is due to information responsibilities of the cc service when they reverse transactions.

Anyways, following your argumentation: how does it make sense for the store to punish the devs when on the other hand it doesn't make sense (for you) to punish the customer? And why the heck do devs still blame customers but not the shop? Remember: the shop is selling keys and it is the shops work to keep track of payment information.

Sorry to say but your logic is still yuck.

Acting pathetic doesn't solve your problems.

See it doesn't matter how keys are generated as they're sold on an individual basis. Thus You can keep track of the exact credit card transaction that was used to buy each key. If You don't save this information linked to each other then it's your fault as the store manager. Don't try to shift a problem of sales management to the customer. It doesn't solve your problem but makes you looking yuck.

I'm not going to do their work (as they're not going to do mine) but good luck to You for defending the incapabilities of crybabies.