Porcupirate

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A stretch, yes. But it’s an interesting model for understanding what communication is. By telling you this, I am manipulating you into understanding my point of view and hopefully getting you to agree with me.

It’s important to note that not all manipulation is negative. I should hope parents manipulate their children into being aware of safety.

Even chit-chat could be seen as manipulating each other into “being social” but even I would say that’s a long shot.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

The Dutch system does have fractional representation and multi-party coalition governments, and still the far-right is on the rise.

This is a complex situation, not simply fixed with a magic bullet of voting reform.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

You’d think that euronews, a European news org, would know the difference.

Nothing about Lapland in this article 🤷

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I agree, but this billionaire can do what few communities can: invest in scale.

Overall I still think this is good news.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I believe some websites say “fuck it, fuck them” and block European IPs rather than put in the work to become GDPR compliant

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Also, why not just do what happened with Iodised salt in the real world?

Add a tiny amount of dietary enzymes to certain foods you’re sure will be consumed anyway. Provide the food industry with these supplements free of charge but check this supply strictly. The consumers don’t pay extra but they will have the necessary enzyme intake to stay healthy. If criminals want to extract Intium, they will be forced to buy these food products in insanely infeasible quantities.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Given this scenario, as a policy-maker I would start with statements explaining the issue in a press conference. This should create public support for further measures. I assume the properties of Intium are understood by the general public, as are the reasons for the heavy regulation. The least motivated of the abusers might even come to realise that what they are doing is bad.

After this, my first short-term policy decision is to limit the amount of Intium supplements any one customer can pick up from the grocery store in one visit. Say six months worth (24 pills if once-weekly intake is normal). Stores in our world already do that sometimes when they are running a limited promotion and it’s not too hard to implement. Using existing infrastructure, just asking cashiers to made sure customers can only check out one box at a time.

If these pills only contain trace amounts of Intium, this policy will make profitable backyard chemistry impossible. Going up a level, any organised crime boss will understand that paying people to visit multiple stores and collect enough supplements to process, will cost more than the value of the Intium gained. Of course I would also have the law enforcement agencies conduct investigations into such practices.

If the problem still persists through corruption in supply chains or ineffective enforcement, I would use the population registry to compile a list of those creatures that truly need the supplements. A new government service would be created that mails these recipients their allocation of supplements. Existing government facilities like post offices or pharmacies can also start dispensing smaller quantities without any registration required.

Creating an extra government agency is of course only logical if the costs of manufacturing the misused supplements outweigh the savings that such a service would provide.

Concurrent with all of these steps, I would speak with the pharmaceutical industry and ask if it were possible to create a supplement that did not contain any Intium. Given the high-tech nature of your society, I believe this would be possible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I wish I remembered which episode it was… went looking for it but I couldn’t find much. Sorry :(

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

You’re not going crazy. He did this intentionally in order to get new views from the YouTube algorithm. He described how and why in a Cortex episode a while back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It’s awesome!  Since you asked for feedback, I should mention that there are not a lot of settlements near the coast. Coastal locations, especially near river deltas, are very logical places to settle due to fishing and trade. Unless the ocean is barren the coast should be littered with little fishing villages and at least a few major ports.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course someone else’s response isn’t your fault. I’m not saying that you are wrong for disliking it, either. The unfortunate truth is that in every community, you will find people who just don’t know how to argue. That group gets bigger if the community grows. Being angry about it doesn’t help anyone though.

What I meant with the “hwell acktually” comment is maybe the same as you just said but in different words: people who like to be right all the time and feel good bout it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Even if you limit it by range, like only recolouring things within 1 meter of where you touch… It’d still be a great power! Imagine the money you’d make, flawlessly painting whole rooms in seconds.

view more: next ›