Red_sun_in_the_sky

joined 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 22 minutes ago) (1 children)

I mocked the term "brahmin heritage" cause that's akin to zionist heritage or white heritage. Hence the mocking.

Now her grandfather had such standings in India that he worked at higher positions in 50s. Now you mentioned that the uc enjoy a certain socioeconomic status. Yes, kamala herself is a high profile lawyer while her sister is also a lawyer who worked at shit like ford foundation. Even her niece is part of upper echelons of the company uber.

Now all my comments on this post pretty much put forth what I have to say about it. But I will try to explain why I point to the brahmin background. Yeah she might not care about her familial background or whatever, its still pertinent that prominent daughter of person hailing from a tambrahm is part of the western imperial machine. Sure she doesn't care about her brahmin family even if that aided her position.

Now you say her views might only come from her parents not the diaspora brahmins or sangh. Ok. Kamala herself even if she didn't get any views from brahmins she is still aligned with sangh. And broader sangh will still view her as a brahmin. Cause most of what she perpetuates through her position in USA is still very aligned with the sangh. The fact that a person who has brahmin roots ends up in western echelons to participate in their conquest is not really misaligned from the sangh. Its not so much that who influenced her but rather what her actions are and with who she is aligned. At present she is a segregationist and a genocidal warmonger. Not so different from hindu fascist. So when a person hailing from the upper castes perpetuates more oppression wherever they go I'm inclined to point to their brahmin or other upper caste roots. Cause the oppression they do starts here where I live.

People from here don't see a person who was born to an american settler but a brahmin settler. If she wins and she will be viewed as a hindu upper caste descendant who made it big from where I am.

I'll leave the quote from her father :

“My dear departed grandmothers (whose extraordinary legacy I described in a recent essay on this website), as well as my deceased parents, must be turning in their grave right now to see their family’s name, reputation and proud Jamaican identity being connected, in any way, jokingly or not with the fraudulent stereotype of a pot-smoking joy seeker and in the pursuit of identity politics,”

I guess she does have influences and apparently knows her heritage (at least claims)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

I was just responding. I made a post about a brahmin genocide overseer. And was talking about how diaspora brahmins and sangh view her. Not broader Indians who might come from various backgrounds. Now my earlier reply was a clarification about that. If that is too "insert debate bro term" for you then don't come in talking about how I'm being racist to a brahmin while you don't even know shit.

I'll disengage now and you can weep about anti brahmin racism.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

I keep coming to this comment to this comment cause of how moronic it is. Brahmins who settle elsewhere or marry someone or so do any upper caste are still useful to the sangh. At the end of it those of them at the levers of power only work for the bourgeois and their kids even climb the career ladder cause their caste bought them that far. Gandhi was a uppercaste man who planned live abroad as a lawyer but he returned back to partake in indpendence movement. Even then his caste position and his casteist ideology only served as an obstruction to any Indian progress. No matter what movements they spearhead or be part those who only utilize their upper caste standings to go propel oneself always come back to serve those interests one way or the other.

Kamala or whoever other brahmin descendants doesn't matter, its funny that their oppressor caste roots bought them to america where they can be part of the global capitalist oppressors and oversee genocides.

Now I lived around upper caste folk and seen their presence in my country for decades. Seen how they oversee mass pogroms and also live cushily abroad. Or use progressive language to create fake persecution narratives about themselves. Keep completely holding their hegemonic reigns over my country and keep their positions safe all the while completely subjugating millions.

I don't know about brahmins or casteism just cause I'm a south Indian. I learned about it apart from living in it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (6 children)

Again wanna discuss discuss. Otherwise gtfo with the weird debatebro shit.

You don't even understand these dynamics but come in here to yell about racism towards brahmins.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Lol stfu. Either engage about topic at hand. Or leave. No investigation no right to speak.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago (8 children)

Diaspora BRAHMINS or SANGH. Not Indians broadly or other diaspora. Know what that means. This isn't the gotcha you think it is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

This is very unhinged. I'm a south indian who does know more about brahminism and caste. Me pointing out how these people from uc end up serving fascists isn't racism. You don't understand anything about how broader sangh or brahmins function.

Samuel hoare worked with fascist people. Mike hoare was cia scumbag who worked relentlessly to overthrow governments in south africa or congo. Now me saying british settlers settling in ireland, usa, india or Australia end up serving empire isn't some racism.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago (10 children)

I'm not talking about diaspora Indians. I very clearly said sangh and brahmin transplants.

I don't care what americans think. You should know more about India then. Broader Indian public can tell who these folk are that's how much at forefront caste is. You think just cause usha or kamala live in usa or american citizens Indians won't think they are brahmin? That's very funny.

Calling a brahmin brahmin is not racism. Wtf. Anti brahmin racism is when I point to baman uc that they hail from solid uc background. Gtfo

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

Yeah. Now read what I wrote again. She hails from a brahmin family from her mother's side. She is still a brahmin for the broader sangh as they view her as such. This is still one of many instances where people from upper castes even settling abroad end up serving in the ruling class.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

How am I being racist towards brahmins? Please enlighten me.

நான் சொன்னது உண்மை தான்

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago (5 children)

How? I called three brahmins I mentioned brahmins. How am I being racist by pointing out how casteism favors these upper caste people to pave their way to power or that the brahmin diaspora is sangh adjacent.

I know a thing or two about brahmins. Cause I am from South India.

 

Damn that's so shocking 😧

Also kamala, still the least fascist brahmin.

18
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/3237566

I posted this on lemmygrad but also posted here for discussion. I'm sure this was discussed before but I still want to ask.

If you remember a while back there was a tweet from blinken about ussr and babyn yar. If you don't remember, he asserts that "Ussr buried the atrocity and says ukraine is suffering now".

Anyway afterwards there was a deluge of discussion all around about how disgusting the tweet was but also some people were loud about how he is actually right. And also refer to some wikipedia citation.

So I will list the points I saw at the time:

  • Soviets downplayed holocaust and never mentioned jews being singled out in babyn yar.
  • That broadly only mentioning as soviet citizens dying in atrocities done by fascists and refusal to acknowledge roma people.
  • That originally the extraordinary commision mainly downplayed babyn yar.

This brings me to the actual stuff I want to talk. Mainly there is a narrative at least that only liberalization made it possible for the victims of holocaust heard in post ussr. And that the soviets were very antisemitic and downplayed romani or other oppressed people by branding them as counter revolutionary.

What are your thoughts on this? On the narrative that liberalisation made the victims of holocaust heard and before that Ussr was only trivializing holocaust by mentioning them as soviet citizens.

12
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I'm sure this was discussed before but I still want to ask.

If you remember a while back there was a tweet from blinken about ussr and babyn yar. If you don't remember, he asserts that "Ussr buried the atrocity and says ukraine is suffering now".

Anyway afterwards there was a deluge of discussion all around about how disgusting the tweet was but also some people were loud about how he is actually right. And also refer to some wikipedia citation.

So I will list the points I saw at the time:

  • Soviets downplayed holocaust and never mentioned jews being singled out in babyn yar.
  • That broadly only mentioning as soviet citizens dying in atrocities done by fascists and refusal to acknowledge roma people.
  • That originally the extraordinary commision mainly downplayed babyn yar.

This brings me to the actual stuff I want to talk. Mainly there is a narrative at least that only liberalization made it possible for the victims of holocaust heard in post ussr. And that the soviets were very antisemitic and downplayed romani or other oppressed people by branding them as counter revolutionary.

What are your thoughts on this? On the narrative that liberalisation made the victims of holocaust heard and before that Ussr was only trivializing holocaust by mentioning them as soviet citizens.

 

I keep seeing that some non domestic issue is being pushed by russian bots to stop voting for kamala.

I'll keep it simple so you uneducateds can understand.

I'm a vegan and I can order a ham sandwich and not eat it. You can vote blue and save rights and fuck off.

 

Bbbbaaseeed 😖 baaaaaasedd 😣baaaaasassssed baaased🥹😍🫡

 

Some genius takes:

The whole Global North/South split is a pet peeve of mine as a social scientist working in development policy. It's a bunch of outdated garbage from the Cold War that was really just a thinly veiled dogwhistle for 'white/the good Asians' and 'not white'. It doesn't hold up to any rational examination. South Africa was part of the Global North until white rule under Apartheid ended, and now they're in the Global South. southern nations.

Real educated economist chimes in:

Jason Hickel is an anthropologist (read: not economist) and degrowther. Despite having no background and seemingly almost no understanding of economics as a field, he somehow continues to get 'economics' papers published in reputable journals despite their obvious low quality. But to anyone with a cursory understanding of economics, it should be entirely unsurprising that exports from developing nations to developed are more labor intensive than vice-versa. This is not a novel conclusion and is not 'appropriation', but is entirely explained by a concept in economics called comparative advantage.

Another genius owns the article epic style

This paper is a demonstration of why input-output (IO) models are bad for economic research. IO models were used by the soviet central planners to allocate resources. IO models are bad for research for the same reason the are bad for planning. The authors look at “embodied labor” (adjusted for human capital), the idea being that any two things produced by an hour of (human capital adjusted) labor must have the same value (btw, this “labor theory of value” goes back to Adam Smith, and was later promulgated by Marx).

Other facts that the authors’ framework will struggle to explain: why is it that the poor countries that most integrated with global trade networks became rich (s korea, Japan, Singapore) or are otherwise growing quickly (china, Panama, Vietnam)? Why is it that countries with severe barriers to trade with the global north struggle to grow (n Korea, India for second half of 20th century)? That’s very hard to explain if trade with the global north is fundamentally exploitative.

 
  1. Eat a lot before going to vote. A lot.
  2. Reach the polling center and enter the booth.
  3. Now is the important part, Take a huge shit on the ballot.
  4. Turn in your ballot with the turd to cast the vote.

Rest assured your shit will be stuffed into a ballot box. That's the rule and they have do that.

Thank you for you service. Remember to do this again.

 

Best highlights:

Well since marx and his antisemtic works to stalinist antisemitism to the current rush of commies who are all antisemitic cause they follow marx and stalin.

Leftist organizing is filled with antisemitism. Why won't condemn china russia or sri lanka for their genocides while only condemning israel. See this is why lot of jewish folk are feeling this anti zionism is antisemitic.

Find nuance within zionism rather than just being anti zionist as all those rabid college protestors

Banning israeli who served in the idf once is not a good look and obviously anti semitic.

Neil druckman is being unfairly maligned.

A lot of leftists praise hamas and that's as bad as idf. Y'all blindly supoort them just cause they are fighting israel. Meanwhile you all ignore sri lanka doing tamil genocide and the ccp doing uyghur genocide. But you all cheer on jewish civilians killed on oct 7.

Equating zionist to white supremacy or white people is very antisemitic. You leftists don't condemn sri lanka or china cause they are not white. This is a common stalinist tradition.

Also hamas is just has their own interests and don't care about jeopardizing palestine's future.

Zionism was not the product of its leaders. Implying they pushed it or they were powerful is antisemitic. It actually formed cause jewish folk escaped persecution and came here. It was a movement cause it has emotional appeal. Zionism is an emotion. Holocaust was the reason for all the jewish folk to form a jewish state.

Do you condemn hamas? Hamas attacks on civillians parallels nazi attacks for the average gentile. Hamas is a fundamentalist antisemitic group.

Horsehoe theory???//

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

 

Ummm lebensraum is fine but don't suggest fighting against it. Thank you.

https://xcancel.com/BriannaWu/status/1812275113552912728#m

 

I've been getting hate mail from all these tenants saying "Hope you get mao'd you fuckin kkkracker"

That's a slur and hateful as per adl

I'm reporting this to authorities as racial harassment.

Pray for my wellbeing 😢

 

PUTLER DESTROYED AMERICAN DEMOCRACY ONCE AGAIN. HE MADE BIDEN TO STEP DOWN AND MAKING TRUMP WIN😣.

ALL THE MEDIA IS PAID OFF BY PUTLER TO MALIGN JOE BIDEN😦.

HE INTERFERED THROUGH FACEBOOK STEALING THEM BLIND, PUTLER. YOU ALL GOTTA STOP HIM?!!??!! 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

view more: next ›