Serinus

Your skin doesn't have to be brown for the cops to decide they don't like you, but it helps.

Yeah, and fuck that. If I perform well on the job, I'm sure as hell not being there for mandated bullshit. Fire me if you want.

Guess what those policies do? They drive your good employees away, and you keep those who can't find somewhere better.

If people are here, I'll gladly step it up a bit. A few comments goes a long way!

Why do they need to work these two weekends on a project that has been ongoing for years?

They'll ship something, just to head off fraud claims.

He notably didn't say they needed to do better for the American people or that they needed to have better policies.

He said they needed to do better to earn our trust. They don't want to change what they're doing; they just want to make us agree with it.

Vance over performed slightly. I'd say Walz underperformed slightly. Walz was too nice.

In the end, I think Walz wins by a fair margin. Plus Walz got the biggest two soundbites that will be played for the next week ad nauseum.

Vance had absolute shit to work with. Walz could have given the Independence Day speech.

I actually appreciate the part where Walz went off script and responded directly to Vance and the question asked. It was about Congress making the laws, and not the Vice President. They'll likely use that to attack Walz and Harris, but I appreciated him dropping a bit of the show and just conveying reality.

The changes they were talking about require a vote from Congress. Vance dismissing that and saying it can be done through executive action should be concerning. Technically, it might be true, considering the President can just start shooting/jailing congresspeople until they vote his way. But I don't think that's what they wanted to express.

What's wrong with just linking to Wikipedia?

Which one? Clearly anything Hamas does is justified retaliation, so Israel is retaliating enough just there won't be significant retaliation.

Why is the first part of October missing data?

an off the cuff thing we'll take too seriously

I too once thought r/the_donald was funny.

Here comes the subtle propaganda accounts. "No really, I'm gonna vote for this liar".

Bullshit. The whole point is to put Walz's slight mistiming of a story that happened 40 years ago on the same level as "they're eating the dogs!"

Is it a coincidence that these people are coming out on October 1st, about the same time Reddit got hit with a massive wave of bots?