SolarTapestryofNoise

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Goes into the budget is my understanding. It becomes departmental funds.

Very very poorly for the individual because your intent cannot be factored into the case. The money itself has to be proven innocent from criminal activity. It's essentially designed to be as hard as possible for the individual to get their money back. I am not a lawyer and I am pulling this from memory so i could be wildly off base with this.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (11 children)

The police department gets it. If you want your money back it's the seized money vs the state in a court, not you personally vs the state, the money itself vs the state.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yes. Mostly because it would "validate" extremely thinly veiled sexism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But what genre? My money would be on either garage Ska-punk or folksey Americana

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Cause sky daddy "told" them to.

Don't you dare point out that sky daddy's son said the opposite and hung out with whores, poors, and the sick with sores.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

.....Semetics/semitism?

Anti=against/opposite

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not an analogy, T-Boner, that was a false equivalence. Sorry you are unable to comprehend basic English.