[-] [email protected] 49 points 9 hours ago

It's possible to learn from your mistakes and then pass that knowledge on to others

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Yeah, but we all already know who she is

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

UN definition of genocide: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml

Although you can't technically genocide trans people because they're not one of the special groups outlined in the definition, you don't actually need to kill people to commit a genocide. I would argue that there is "intent to destroy, in whole or in part" trans people by "Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group" and "Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part". By taking away healthcare and other accommodations, serious harm is caused to trans people. Couple this with the high suicide rates of bullied and marginalised trans people, one could argue that the lawmakers are intending to kill trans people (although I personally wouldn't go that far)

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

UN definition of genocide: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml

Although you can't technically genocide trans people because they're not one of the special groups outlined in the definition, you don't actually need to kill people to commit a genocide. I would argue that there is "intent to destroy, in whole or in part" trans people by "Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group" and "Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part". By taking away healthcare and other accommodations, serious harm is caused to trans people. Couple this with the high suicide rates of bullied and marginalised trans people, one could argue that the lawmakers are intending to kill trans people (although I personally wouldn't go that far)

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Trans-mascs rejoice

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

If I was on OnlyFans, no-one else would stand a chance

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Clearly a Traffic Sign Swallow

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Just to back up your point, I'm probably the most gorgeous person ever born, but I don't have a romantic partner

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

I hear that's where women are from

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

If you're a certian type of Twitch steamer and shit while you're working, you'll be making a lot more dollars

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

You were completely correct the first time, I was making a joke about how to remember which gender is niece and nephew because I struggle remembering

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

I thought you're only supposed to post bad foods here?

29
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I think it's a tobacco trial. The main character is the wife of one of the jurors? I think the bad guy / big company is trying to buy the jurors out by using the services of the wife

63
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

An option for me to buy a house has come up very suddenly and it seemed like a good idea at first - but I look at a mortgage and think "that's 15 years I'll spend paying back, at absolute minimum. Probably more like 25 years" - how can I possibly plan that far in advance?

So, how did you feel about getting a mortgage and seeing such a serious commitment stretch so far into the future? I'm mainly talking about the emotional side of things rather than financial

32
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Cooking my dinner, best set a timer because I'm bound to forget it's in the over.

Get bored and start reading book.

Timer's done - I'll turn off the alarm and just finish the page.

Ten minutes later ...Wait, what's that burning smell?

130
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I've been driving a van for a couple of years now, but I'm much more used to driving a car. My van is heavier and has much less power than my car and I sometimes have trouble merging onto fast roads so I'm looking for any insight from more experienced van drivers.

I don't have rear windows or a rearview mirror (only side mirrors) so visibility isn't always great. The van's also pretty slow, so I'm usually only going 50-60mph as I merge. This isn't a problem on motorways because the slip roads are so long I can plan my spot to merge easily enough. On dual carriageways where the slip roads can be really short, it feels like all I can do is put my foot down and hope. There's sometimes only a few seconds where the sliproad and main road are lined up such that I can see traffic in my mirrors, and by then I'm pretty much stuck at whatever speed my poor van has given with my foot to the floor.

Bigger and heavier vehicles than mine merge safely all the time, so I must be missing something. I'm also fairly inexperienced with such slip roads because there are no examples near me. I only encounter them a couple of times a year.

7
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Looking for songs where there's a very definite, regular beat that's played by a non-percussion instrument. (piano counts as non-percussion for this particular request).

9
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The pertinent ruling is apparently

608.2g: If an effect gives a player the option to pay mana, they may activate mana abilities before taking that action. If an effect specifically instructs or allows a player to cast a spell during resolution, they do so by following the steps in rules 601.2a-i, except no player receives priority after it's cast. That spell becomes the topmost object on the stack, and the currently resolving spell or ability continues to resolve, which may include casting other spells this way. No other spells can normally be cast and no other abilities can normally be activated during resolution.

EDIT: the above rule is why you can cast spells with Gix. There's a ruling on Xanathar that says "Xanathar doesn't change when you can cast spells [...] You must still follow all normal timing rules"

8
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Very fun, upbeat song about someone figuring out their life. I like this song a lot and it's one of the rare occasions where I feel the music video adds to the story in the song.

76
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Let's imagine it's currently Wednesday the 1st. Does "next Saturday" mean Saturday the 4th (the next Saturday to occur) or Saturday the 11th (the Saturday of next week)?

11
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Having diverse worlds and representing different types of people is a good thing. For something like skin colour, sexuality or gender it's very easy to just say that your character posseses those qualities because it doesn't necessarily change much about them. However, how do people feel about playing NPCs who are neurodivergent?

The main example I'm thinking of is someone with Down syndrome. I don't have that lived experience to draw from because I don't have Down syndrome, but I also feel that these people (like all people) can be valuable members of society and I don't like to see them excluded. Therefore, I would want to see them in my fantasy worlds too. The problem is, I worry I'd mainly be falling back on stereotypes in a potentially harmful and offensive way.

EDIT: I would especially like other neurodivergent people to chime in, of course. Personally I really like to see representation for my neurodivergence in D&D and other literature, but also it can really upset me when it's done badly and it's worse than nothing at all

29
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Let's say that it's scientifically proven that ghosts exist. Would they then stop being supernatural and become natural, thus making it impossible to ever have proof of the supernatural?

view more: next ›

Worx

joined 11 months ago