ahdok

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I suppose y'all can have a bonus Konsi, as a treat.

 

You can seem 1 foot shorter or taller and can appear heavier or lighter. You must adopt a form that has the same basic arrangement of limbs as you have. Otherwise, the extent of the illusion is up to you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Okay, it should be working reasonably now, hopefully what we've done will be robust enough to take us to the server move.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

We've been having server issues for a while, I know. The main culprit has been a massive increase in scraper bots that effectively serve as a DDOS on my site. Long term they should be solved by the upcoming server migration that's coming, but that's a long and slow process.

I think I have a stopgap solution this week that should get it up and working well... it's not cheap but I'm willing to put some money into making sure people can read the comics.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 6 days ago (4 children)

That depends how much experience you have, it's mini for some people.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

I am the one who snocks.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I am the one who snoots.

 

I'm always cleaning up murder scenes... they all say that they want the gore gone.


Okay, jokes are done, continue with your day.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well... "ethical" is a thorny subject. The underlying imagenet technology was still built on mturk, and usage still drives up the usage figures for these billion dollar art-thieves to use in their investment rounds. It's still environmentally catastrophic compared to regular image searches, and it's still used by proponents of the technology to normalize its use, so they can promote it to replace jobs.

A good deal of the "ethical" problems with generative-AI are baked into the technology itself... but it's certainly more acceptable than other uses.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, there are plenty of people for whom this advice is really needed. I've a couple decades experience running drop-in games and boy do people do this for real. It's a table-wrecker.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Crawford's statement there makes it clear that he believes "being turned to dust" kills you. He believes it's so obvious that he doesn't need to explain it. That's why his statement just takes "you're killed" as a given.

The rules aren't written in such a fashion as to very slowly and patiently explain every possible interpretation to you and hold-your hand to finding the correct one. They assume you have a basic reading comprehension. It's not really WotC's job to fix that if it's a failed assumption.

WotC don't issue errata for stuff like this, because they think the argument is facially stupid. If they issued errata for every facially stupid argument, then the errata document would become so large that it'd be unusable - there's an infinite well of dumb takes that don't require an errata to clean up.

That's the job of your DM.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Well, regardless of anything, WotC can't prevent this kind of argument by "writing better rules." This isn't the kind of "gotcha" edge case they should need to cover - that's what the DM is for.

Rules lawyers will always appeal to the "the rules don't explicitly state a caveat the one weird edge case I made up that's plainly not intended" as if it's a valid position. You can't build a system this complex and exhaustively cover every take, and the intended mechanism for handling this is that the DM decides if they'll accept such things or not. That depends on your DM and table culture.


As a general piece of advice, this is an extreme level of "the rules don't explicitly say the exact thing I think they should say with the exact wording I demand of them, so therefore my take is RAW". Most DMs would probably not want to keep running a game where this happens regularly. It's exhausting, and they'd rather be getting on with the game, or they'd rather be crafting new NPCs and side-stories. My advice would be to talk things over with your DM away from the table to see what style of game they enjoy before deploying something like this at the table.

You specifically asked for where in RAW it says you can't do this. Cephalotrocity correctly identified the part of RAW that's supposed to do that for you. It's up to you whether you want to accept that or not. It's up to your DM if they want to play with you or not.


Given all this, you asked "where does the RAW say you can't do this" and you've been shown the section that's supposed to do that I don't have much more advice for you - your question has been answered.

I'm going back to drawing silly comics instead.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

The RAW makes a lot of assumptions about the reading comprehension of the reader though. If you want the RAW to hold your hand through understanding basic English, then you're always going to have these problems.

Look, in your opening post, you state "Clearly, if they intended for disintegration to kill you, they’d have said so."

They HAVE said so. Crawford has explicitly clarified this.

 

This comic follows on from the Previous comic which will almost certainly provide context.

Just enthralled. Completely spellbound. Beguiled, charmed, under your spell.

 

This comic follows on from the Previous comic which will almost certainly provide context.

This is peak political strategy, we all know it.

 

This comic follows on from the Previous comic which will almost certainly provide context.

You might not wanna be famous, but when you're level 10, every organization within a mile is watching what you're doing.

 

This comic follows on from the Previous comic which will almost certainly provide context.

Zero consideration given to the possibility that Konsi realized this herself and said it deliberately.

 

Both of the guards have a handle. If the guard that always lies pulls his handle, then the minecart will divert to the second track. If both guards pull their handle, the prisoners will be released. One of the handles is covered by a wooden box, where half of the wooden planks of the original box have been replaced by new ones cut from a tree that fell when nobody was around. If guard A is taller than guard B, are we getting paid for this quest?

 

This comic follows on from the Previous comic which will almost certainly provide context.

Zero consideration given to the possibility that Konsi realized this herself and said it deliberately.

 

This comic follows on from the Previous comic which might help provide context.

Audience entry cost is a silver piece, which you flip. You get to keep it if you call the flip correctly.

 

This comic follows on from the Previous comic which might help provide context.

Why would Konsi play with such a handicap?

  1. Growing up as a street urchin, she never really had access to lots of clothes. When not wearing armour, or dressing up for an event, she’s still most comfortable wearing just a simple robe.

  2. She’s trying to practice keeping her cool under pressure, and that’s not effective if you have a lot of safety.

 

This comic follows on from the Previous comic which might help provide context.

Technically any poker depicted in a comic strip qualifies for this.

 

Guess nobody's free to play.

view more: next ›