anytimesoon

Pretty sure they said something like that after the referendum, which is coming up to 10 years ago at this point

Falls in line with the lizardman constant https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slate_Star_Codex#Lizardman's_Constant

Believe it or no, plot twists are scripted 65%.

This is totally true. I read it on snoops

Is hammer still producing films?

I use tandoor. It's Foss and self hostable.

For me, the killer feature is the ability to create meal plans that auto generate a shopping list

Said by someone who has clearly not travelled the world and tasted "white people" food

The only thing that really matters here is to find a bean you like the taste of. When you have that, you can't really make a bad cup from it.

I think most of the techniques we read about in forums are for when you have a bean that is either OK or bad for you. At that point, you'll appreciate the techniques to help elevate the coffee to something you find palatable

But he was/is very articulate?

Don't forget his presidency came off the back of W. We were all sick of hearing gibberish from the president of the united states. Everyone was happy to have an articulate man in charge

Not an endorsement, because I've never used it, but kagi is an alternative which I believe has it's own index. It isn't free though

There is also searxng which is more of a meta search that will post your query to a bunch of search engines at once

Not much of this makes sense. Maybe we don't have an equal understanding of private. If thats the case, this discussion is going nowhere.

I will point out, though, that this is particularly nonsensical

Govts are only after Telegram because they can't infiltrate the company, ask for data etc.

Telegram doesn't use encryption. Everything is in clear text. Nobody needs a back door to get access. Not even governments. It's all just out in the open

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. You start by agreeing that telegram is simply not private. Then you move on to implying that it must be, because the CEO got arrested?

How does that change the fact that it is, by your own assessment, not private?

To answer your question, the answer from my perspective is quite simple. Noncompliance. If telegram had complied to local laws, like the others have and continue to do, he would not have gotten in trouble.

I'm still confused about people who consider telegram a private chat.

It's easy to verify for yourself that it isn't, so how is this still going around?