arquebus_x

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

NPR is not free; it's paid for by taxes, which means that every U.S. citizen is in fact paying for news whether they like it or not. And "not for profit" is not the same as "no cost to the consumer." In addition, most of the outlets for NPR are local public radio stations that are - you guessed it - funded by taxes (as well as fund drives).

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 months ago

That phrase doesn't mean what you think it means.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't help that wage growth has largely been in the "unskilled" sectors (I hate that term, every job is skilled), but inflation reduction has largely been in non-essential goods. Which means that upper-middle to upper income people have been noticing their wages not increasing with inflation despite inflation overall being lower, and lower to low-middle income people have been noticing inflation impacting their budgets despite their wage increases.

But in aggregate, "everyone" is being paid more and "inflation" is down. So at a macro level everyone "should" be happy with how things are going. But human beings don't live at the macro level.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Economists don't call something a recession until rich people start feeling the squeeze. The definition of a recession, while vague, is really designed around that fact. So even if they're not doing it on purpose, their analytical blinders prevent them from recognizing other conditions that are at least as meaningful to many more people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Yes but also no. The U.S. isn't a party to the ICC. It's not under ICC jurisdiction regardless of the ASMPA. The function of the ASMPA is mostly to serve as political theater.

The U.S. should be a party to the ICC, but it's not and it likely never will be.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Except the U.S. is not a party to the ICC and therefore not subject to its jurisdiction. It should be, but it's not. This is bullshit fear-mongering over something that literally cannot happen, in order to distract people from the thing that will and should be happening.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The whole point of Jenny Nicholson's epic video was that it did NOT, in fact, offer a "unique, interactive 48-hour movie-like adventure."

That Screen Rant article was almost certainly planted by Disney PR. No actual employee who had to deal with all that bullshit would write something so sycophantic.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 months ago (15 children)

I was going to get this game. Now I'm not.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I love what Wikipedia says, succinctly:

"The Time Cube website did not have a home page as such…In one paragraph, he claimed that his own wisdom 'so antiquates known knowledge' that a psychiatrist examining his behavior diagnosed him with schizophrenia."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This law doesn’t apply to any of the restaurants you describe. No table service.

Companies absolutely do try to staff fast food as short as possible. If they didn’t, you’d never experience a line.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Before we get out the flaming pitchforks, let us not forget that pretty much no one reads or cares about the New York Times. Their readership (print and web) is minuscule compared to entities like CNN, NBC News, ABC News, CBS News, MSNBC (and Fox, OANN, Breitbart, Joe Rogan...).

Sure, it sucks that the NYT is sucking Trump cock, but in the end, that won't move the needle.

view more: next ›