The article is a worth a read, answers the question in the first couple paragraphs, and isn't a site flooded with ads. You're just saving people from learning more than the answer to the headline
Me explaining how HRT changed my thighs
It's nice to see a liberal refrain from calling someone they disagree with Russian/Chinese
And here's to the cops of Mississippi They're chewing their tobacco As they lock the prison door And their bellies bounce inside them When they knock you to the floor No, they don't like taking prisoners In their private little wars And behind their broken badges There are murderers and more
I'm not posting this to make fun of Mississippi. I just think it's telling that the opposite of "Mississippi Goddam" (Nina Simone civil rights song) is "thank god for Mississippi" (ghoulish joke at the expense of Poor and Black misssissipians)
Right, but the supreme Court would just find that law unconstitutional. Or ignore the implicit meaning.
They take getting caught seriously, not the stuff they get caught at.
Wut. I'm not sure if this is a distinction without a difference, or a subtle distinction that I need a better grasp on continental philosophy to comprehend.
It's like saying a state doesn't take murder seriously - they take getting caught seriously. It's technically true if you parse it a certain way, but ultimately meaningless
this kind of thing is not bad because it endangered people’s lives, it’s bad because it makes them look bad and might impact their exports
Something can be bad for multiple reasons. Also, there's multiple actors here. The operators of the state-owned enterprise have different incentives than the regulators