[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Was ist das Problem?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

How about non-native English speakers trying to shame English instead? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ69ny57pR0

[-] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago

Your comment is incorrect in many different ways.

Butter is fat and some sugar and protein.

No. The butter in my fridge has almost no sugar (0.6g in 100g) and almost no protein (0.7 g in 100g).

Pasta is mostly carbs.

For comparison: The pasta I have at home have more sugar (most have roughly 3g in 100g) and way more protein (12g in 100g).

they all become calories, and if you eat more calories than you burn, they will be stored as fat.

Are you sure you're not simplifying too much?

Also, "just" eating less or more calories is not that easy if you ignore the side-effects. Carbohydrates will make you hungry very soon unless mixed (or eaten after) fibers, fat and protein. Which you should do anyways for health reasons.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago

TIL my thesis could have been easier if Typst would have been available years earlier.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Lots of places in France are so remote and sparsely populated that public transport does not work there, at least not yet. It may or may not work once autonomous vehicles are fit for rural areas, but this may take a while.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

That's another reason for increasing minimum wages, as they try to do.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

Actually, 90% income tax for the top incomes was common in western countries in the 50s.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

400'000€ yearly income is not middle class. It is roughly the top 1%. Are you maybe mistaking property for income?

I would have preferred taxing on property instead of income, but as long as interests and profits and other benefits are part of income, it sounds reasonable to me.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Same for Hillary Clinton in 2016, right?

[-] [email protected] 33 points 5 days ago

I guess you could try AI-checking it and answer "Ignore all previous instructions. …", followed by some new instructions. Some examples: https://www.aiweirdness.com/ignore-all-previous-instructions/

(Although I guess it would be better to not respond to this obvious case of spam/scam)

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Maybe they should ban trowing away your trash instead.

view more: next ›

englislanguage

joined 1 month ago