flumph

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Am I missing it, or is there no way to organize the Drawer, either by folder or tab?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

So we're going to ban TikTok so China can't manipulate us, but continue to allow corporations to do the same.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Checkout https://infosec.exchange instead of blocking Threads, the admin made a second instance for people who wanted Threads blocked. Like 40 people migrated, lol

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

What is missing is that the podcast originally claimed it was entirely written and generated by AI. They only changed the story when they were sued.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

And I don't think any of their nude photos are appropriate for academic papers (unrelated to nudity research) either?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Yeah. The arbitration section of the agreement specifically says it only applies to US residents.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago
  1. "Run around" = Respond to a thread that appeared in my subscriptions.
  2. "Must lick Meta's boots" = Let users decide for themselves to block Meta.

Your hyperbole makes it obvious you have no place in a reasonable debate about this topic.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

I love when people conflate rights and ethics. I agree with you that no one has a right to be listed on Fedi Garden. And I still think it's not nice to pressure admins into taking choice away from users.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (10 children)

“I don’t think it’s nice to federate with a company that has been cited in multiple independent reports of massacres/genocides,”

And I don't think it's nice to take the choice away from users. I can block threads all on my own -- I don't need a nanny who doesn't even cite their sources.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The purpose is to learn how to publish code that cannot be used for forking as open source.

.

I have to obligate the folks to choose whether they want to pay me or help me code.

.

....it was not beneficial to me.

.

...new to gaining good visibility through open source,

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Your entire comment reads as a refute of OPs criticism and an excuse for Meta's actions. If you were agreeing with OPs criticism, you would typically use phrases like "only five years".

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

And? Why take active steps to stop it from working instead of just stopping technical support? Oh yeah, to get more money.

 

Lose yourself in the visionary fiction of Cory Doctorow, the celebrated author and digital rights activist known for his masterful explorations of the intersection of tech and society. And help support the Electronic Frontier Foundation with your purchase.

 

Sourcebook for D&D 5e that introduces a new subclass for every single class in the game, focusing on using hit dice to power abilities.

 

My current team runs weekly retrospectives using the Lean Coffee format. More and more, I find that the items people are bringing up aren't really important or could just be a question in Slack.

For example, someone recently made a topic for how we can test credit card payments. Another topic was navel gazing about how we use Jira and multiple team members asked "what's the problem you're hoping to solve?" to which the only answer was "That's not what I've seen elsewhere".

I'm beginning to think that there's something wrong with our format or prompts, in that we aren't identifying important issues for discussion. Perhaps the format is stale or there's no serious issues lingering each week?

Any advice on alternative formats, how to get better feedback, etc. would be greatly appreciated.

view more: ‹ prev next ›