I would say that by the very nature of it being nukes it was exceptional. Like, the very definition of exceptional. Yes, the USA often bombs instead of negotiating, that is not exceptional.
freagle
joined 2 years ago
Are you saying that using nukes against civilian populations was equivalent to conventional bombing because of "the damage"? What point are you trying to make here?
Wtf are you talking about? It's literally a statement from the Whitehouse. How is Yog being intentionally inflammatory?!
As seen in Nagasaki and Hiroshima
Can't afford a boat? Well, a rising tide lifts dead bodies just as well. Until they drown, that is
Read the founding fathers! They knew exactly what America the beautiful stood for.
The protection of the opulent minority.
DHS pulling for an unelected candidate...
Passed 25 laws? That's wild
Well said and agreed on the direction you're pointing us towards. Not sure I agree on exact implementation details, but I also haven't thought about it too much. Thanks for speaking up. Keep doing it
Lol. You have GOT to be talking about the USA here, right? Talk about corruption-riddled military. The USA spends more on military then the next 11 countries combined and it can't produce artillery shells at the same rate as Russia can under embargo.
Look at the cost of the modern fighter jet program and it's barely functioning. Look at the cost PER MISSILE of the systems they sold to Ukraine and Israel. The USA is the quintessential example of corrupt military industry in the world.