humanenough

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

is pop going to base on Lts moving forward, like mint, or its too early to say?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i mostly worried about keepass for vulnerabibity and virt-manger not getting the latest qemu/libvirt update... but i agree to you, these package aren;t that old.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
11
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
Software Latest Fedora Version Pop! Version
---- 44.0 44.1 42.0
Gnucash 5.3 5.2 4.8
GIMP 2.10.34 2.10.34 2.10.30
------ 1.3.1 dnf 1.3.1 1.3.0
Firewall Gufw 22.04 N/A 22.04.0
~~Timeshift~~ Master.mint21 (Mint) dnf 22.11.2 21.09.1
22.06.6 (TeeJee)
KeepassXC 2.7.6 2.7.6 2.6.6
affected by CVE-2023-35866 (upto 2.7.5)
Libreoffice 7.6.0 (fast adopter) 7.5.5.2 7.3.7.2
7.5.5 (LTS)
Popsicle 1.3.1 (github) AppImage 1.3.1 1.3.2
PDF Arranger 1.10.0 1.10.0 1.8.2
Virt Manager 4.1.0 4.1.0 4.0.0
Videos (totem) 44.0 43.0 42.0
Nautilus 44.0 44.2.1 42.6

I am "not" using Flatpak on Pop!

Most of the cases, those software are from Ubuntu repositories.. would Pop!_OS consider building their own, or as some other people mentioned, rebase on something else?

view more: next ›