its_prolly_fine

Yeah, it's definitely good, for sure. I was being a bit derisive. The double standard just struck me.

It feels very much like the joker meme.

No Aquarius. ☹️

That's not true at all. Essentially every time you have heard of any disease linked to a gene its because of the Human genome project. 23 and me, that is also thanks to HGP. Lots of cancer research has also been done, identifying markers for cancer.

You might not be aware of it, but has been vital for anyone genetic advancement.

Good. But also just doctors? I guess every woman better start training to become a doctor...

AI doesn't know what to do with trumps flabby eyelids. It assumes he must be Asian because his eyes are hidden under folds and folds of flesh

He is so happy!

If grown as a crop I can see that. But taking from forests changes the forest permanently. I see your point, I guess I'm taking issue with what I associate with a renewable resource when talking about energy. That is is "green" and not bad for the environment.

Saying trees are carbon capures so its carbon neutral just seems crazy to me. Burning wood emits more carbon dioxide than coal for every unit of electricity produced. The older the tree the more carbon it can store, which is in its wood. Mature as in 35-75 years. Cutting down mature trees out of forests and planting new ones isn't carbon neutral. But I can see an argument for planting tree plots in already cleared land to get a system set up for rotations.

I simply do not know what you are talking about sir. Such nonsense certainly never comes out of my mouth. Good day to you I say, GOOD DAY!

WTF?! They burn wood pellets? Seriously? How is that even vaguely a renewable resource?

I said drink, clearly. My good man, you must be confused. I certainly wouldn't have fixed it as soon as you said.

I almost spit out my drink. Well done good sir, well done.

Why?