I like your reasoning. I'm a libertarian myself, so I get it.
But I held my nose and voted Democrat the last two Presidential elections because I think Trump is a uniquely dangerous person. I hate the "this time is different" argument, but I actually think it applied this time.
Hmm. Interesting argument.
Maybe people believe that it will save a starving child in the future. Like, some future where politicians finally listen to them?
Morality is not subjective. It is not (or at least should not) be based on emotions.
Of course. But one can hope for insight and help in answering it, no?
But, given that Trump will very likely be as bad or worse, why give him the chance? Just to be able to make the statement?
But considering the alternative to Harris, it doesn't seem as clear as day to me.
That's not out of the question yet.
Thank you. That's a very considered response.
Oy vey.
After what the Clintons did to Haiti...