292
But, we can’t remove the tax-exempt status from churches that are explicitly promoting Republican candidates..?
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
292 points (98.0% liked)
News
23275 readers
3559 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Incidentally, also terrorist-supporrinf organizations.
Thanks, abstainers. Really showed us what a great America you lot believe in.
I didn’t abstain, but the blame doesn’t lie entirely with them. This feels like 2016 all over again, down to blaming the voters instead of the party.
People want change and are unhappy with the state of things, so the Democratic Party runs a status quo candidate against a (psychotic liar) who is making promises about change.
At least a charismatic candidate like an Obama (who doesn’t actually rock the status quo boat too much) would have rallied voters. Why is the Democratic Party so bad at this?
The fault fall on both the DNC and the voters.
The DNC for being god damn awful at campaining and the voters for seeing the situation and still decide not to go vote.
Both can be true.
None of that is even the beginning of an excuse for going out of your way to burn your own and your neighbor's house down.
"They should have been 1000x better than the alternative of burning everything, instead of merely 10x better". This shit just doesn't fly.
And yes the Democrats are guilty of being better than Republicans by an embarrassingly thin 10x margin. Any decent party is 1000x and that should have happened, too.
Don't worry, they're just thinking long-term. They've got a plan to make everything better in 12-16 years, just you wait and see! Any day now!
Write your representative and senators today about invoking the 14th amendment. Worst that happens is nothing changes. Took me less than five minutes.
But someone yesterday told me that it won't be all that bad because John Thune made a minor criticism of something Trump wanted which means that congress is not on his side.
Do... do you mean to tell me he really is going to turn the U.S. into a fascist dictatorship?
Just as the founding fathers envisioned.
Always the plan.
Or concepts of it.
Right wingers only see problems when it happens to them personally. So the only way to get rid of Trump is to give him enough rope to hang himself. This is just a tiny string in that rope. I'm hoping he gathers up enough to end up like Mussolini.
How can they give him anything when he isn't the president yet?
Because the Republicans control the House. They can start working on bills now and pass them next year.
Bills generally take a while to pass, so getting the work done now means more time for the Don to send his enemies to the gulag.
You don't need control of the House to work on bills that you don't even intend to pass until the next session of congress, though. There's nothing stopping the Republicans, Democrats, or even average citizens from writing bills right now that are intended to be voted on by future sessions of congress.
And the House of Reps voting on the bill next week is also meaningless, because the bill has a 0% chance of passing this session with the democrats in control of the senate - and the House of Reps would then have to pass it again once a new session starts. Which, they probably will - but that doesn't make the vote next week somehow less meaningless. So the headline is pure clickbait: Congress isn't about to "gift" Trump anything. The gifts will come next year.
I'm waiting for the I started enacting this bill that hasn't even gone through the legislature yet, with the claims of "I needed to speed up the process". Similar to the other article someone posted about the Senate not needing to approve cabinet positions because it will save time.