So nice job of not addressing the fact that you didn't read the article and nothing I said indicated that I'm trying to sow discord. I will vote for Biden and argue that others should as well
But pretending that the debate helped that cause is worthless. We are losing and pretending we are not doesn't help. Stop fighting with people pointing out reality and be more vocal on why to vote for Biden.
Lol did you? It literally cites a single voter and a poll showing Trump trending better among Latinos than previous electoral performances for that demographic. Nothing in this article actually warranted the headline and meta polls show Trump still ahead. Delusion will only hand us another 4 years of Trump
Yeah he's a creep and so are you
Do you know why there are sources discussing that it isn't? Admittedly can't really even find something reliable worth citing but see some historical Islam groups discussing Makka and Bakka as mentioned in the Quran and attributes to modern Mecca. But this doesn't seem to be in any mainstream articles or easily found academic paper
I'm not really familiar with the subject but curious what's the nuance I'm missing since it feels like there's a weird historical debate here I'd like to read up on
This kind of surprised me but Wikipedia says mecca at least isn't referenced in the Quran: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mecca#:~:text=Mecca%20is%20generally%20considered%20%22the,was%20first%20revealed%20to%20Muhammad.
I don't know about unpolished, wasn't my cup of tea in a lot of ways but felt very polished in almost every regard I can think of
The company stopped, not the owners: https://www.esquire.com/food-drink/restaurants/a36622217/chick-fil-a-owner-donations-against-equality-act/
By that logic any article from a news distributor is garbage. Which while true, you can find the original story from a new wire. Sourcing points is key but having someone write a table of authorities when they can link a video with their thoughts and data is fine
He discusses actual polls you can look up? This isn't a video just saying things it has data
Tautological statements are true so assume you meant bad use of tautology
Yeah but the former is loud, obnoxious and misogynistic about it. Whereas the latter is only heard from to call out the former.
So this piece doesn't source any evidence that it was used and ignores the literal fact that later investigations by Amnesty didn't find credible evidence of use as a military base and the massive Israeli misinformation campaign on that front: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alleged_military_use_of_al-Shifa_hospital#:~:text=During%20the%20Israel%E2%80%93Hamas%20war,Hamas%20and%20hospital%20administrators%20denied.
But yeah let's justify Israel bombing away access to medical care to people forced into a small, war torn area because fuck Palestinians I guess.