moitoi

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The theories and basis are always the same for centuries. They only wrapped them with a new tinfoil.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

"A lot of people are really starting to stand up

The circlejerk, fanboy, etc. issue... These people are megalomaniac.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You are looking for mathematical logic where there isn't one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Samsung still does it. It's called the Xcover lineup.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Govs should never ask. They must implement the regulation. The corporations are so greedy, they will follow for the money.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I'm not assuming. My point is that the dev has to share the revenues with the instances. Without instances, the app is useless. It's not the case so users should give the same.

The other point is that a paid third party client adds a layer what makes the instances less visible. This lack of visibility can lower the donation. Also, you will end with one or two people thinking they pay for the app and so for the instances.

A reminder is always good.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You will attract the fanboys base. But, I second this. People should give the same amount of money to an instance before giving to these closed apps. Without the instances, they couldn't use the apps.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue for me is having the code. If I pay, I want an app without the ads/trackers code.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was something like $3.89 for the pro back in the days.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They was an iOS beta of I remember correctly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Are you in the EU? I was curious and I don't have ads in Europe.

view more: next ›