this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
51 points (91.8% liked)

Apple

17400 readers
261 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If I remember correctly: If it is watertight, replaceable batteries are not required. EZ way to skirt around this stuff.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's really stupid, waterproof phones with replaceable batteries are certainly possible and have been done before.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah.

To ensure the safety of end-users, this Regulation should provide for a limited derogation for portable batteries from the removability and replaceability requirements set for portable batteries concerning appliances that incorporate portable batteries and that are specifically designed to be used, for the majority of the active service of the appliance, in an environment that is regularly subject to splashing water, water streams or water immersion and that are intended to be washable or rinseable.

From here: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0237_EN.html#title1:~:text=(39)%C2%A0%C2%A0%20To,by%20end%2Dusers

So watertight is definitely enough of a reason.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Except this is a bullshit exception because not only is it 100% possible to make waterproof devices with replaceable batteries, they have existed for years already. There is absolutely no technical reason for this, and the exception probably only exists because the corporations influenced the legislators to gut the law.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Until you use some of that money for ~lobbying~ political influence they don’t.

Facebook can get away with advertising literal scam to kids and old people alike and there are no consequences for them.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Govs should never ask. They must implement the regulation. The corporations are so greedy, they will follow for the money.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It seems they are not going to make batterie replaceable without a fight. The waterproof excuse is crap, they already don’t give us repairs if the iphone is « water dommage » and they can just make a new water resistant design around the new requirements

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

The waterproof excuse is crap

Yep. Galaxy S5, released 9 years ago with an IP67, removable battery, sd card and headphone jack with a back you could open with a fingernail.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same lame excuse they used for removing the headphone jack... Never forget what they took from us and the shitty trend they started in the industry

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I think the charging port is the next one to go. Just use wireless charging, roast the battery and buy a new phone when the battery finally dies after a few years. However, if the battery really is replaceable, it’s going to change the economics of this plan.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What a horseshit excuse: add 6 screws on your backplate, give it a frame with center glass, add a grommet. Give a torque setting for the screws to have a good seal in your instructions. L

Done.

Samsung did this shit years ago in a phone with a replaceable plastic back.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't go pros have replaceable batteries too and get used in like the ocean?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes, but they have a very sturdy case. The gopro itself (without the case) is not waterproof.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This is wrong btw.

Since the Hero 5, Go Pros have been waterproof without the case. The current GoPro is waterproof to 10 meters without a case or 60 meters with the case.

Compared to the current iphone which is only water resistant, so can be submerged for 30 minutes, upto 6 meters.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean if you remove the waterproof case you have a naked circuit board, if they could make that waterproof we wouldn't be talking about this.

or are you thinking about ancient gopros that needed an extra sealed case?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They are if i recall correctly(at least the newer ones) waterproof till about 30ft without the extra case and with it till 150ft or so. But the extra case is very thick and sturdy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Samsung still does it. It's called the Xcover lineup.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

It would be great if the EU steps back:

Dear phone manufacturers. It seems to be impossible to build water resistant phones with easily replaceable batteries. So we have an alternative for you: In future you must provide a unconditional, professional battery replacement, free of charge for 10 years for each individual phone which is water resistant. Since the phones are so water resistant you also have to replace all water damaged phones free of charge.

2 hours later Apple announces a keynote for next week. A week later Tim Cook presents us next years iPhone with an easily replaceable battery…

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So glad to see the Apple fans here aren't a bunch of blind yesmen. With an R&D budget the size of Apple's I am sure theres a way to figure somwthing out.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really refreshing to see Apple fans who have not forgotten they are consumers who have features they want as opposed to accepting whatever decision is made for them.

Other site was a weird mix of people who seemed less Apple consumers and shared more in common with Apple shareholders with the lengths they'd go to defend things from Apple's financial point of view.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Indeed, I personally consider myself an apple fan but there are definitely things that are bad. People who think apple has done only good and defend them at all time are just imo thr worst.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Especially since waterproof phones with replaceable batteries already existed. They aren't exactly working from nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I remember dunking my flip phone into glasses of water as a party trick and it was totally fine. This would've been around 2010 or so.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apple needs to have a look at the new Surface devices: https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/14/23761037/microsoft-surface-spare-replacement-parts-microsoft-store and https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/11/23453263/microsoft-surface-pro-9-repairability-improved-ifixit-teardown

Microsoft now sells Surface replacement parts, including displays, batteries, and SSDs / If you have a modern Surface device, then there are plenty of replacement parts to choose from.

Microsoft’s Surface Pro 9 has (...) now has a screwed-in battery module as opposed to an adhered one. Between that and other components having become more modular over the years, repairability is actually achievable.

But instead they're already bitching to the press about this new regulations. This is the same crap they pulled with USB-C, still no USB-C iPhones whatsoever and unlike everyone else I'm not confident it will happen this year. To be frank Apple even decided to srew the customer even more by having newer iPhones come with USB-C to lightening cables and without a charger instead of plain USB-A.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

230$ for a battery!! They have lost their minds lol.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

jeeeeesus christ, the idea that a component in your MOBILE PHONE will never need repair is a one-way ticket to fucking landfill electronics.

add a gasket, holy shit it’s waterproof again!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I mean, they said it never needs to be repaired, so just offer a lifetime warranty if it degrades. Should be easy enough

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Why? Because fuck you, that's why.

I hate Apple, but I'm not going to pretend that a lot of other phones are as unfixable, or close to.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Money. Answer every single time is money

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

and here I thought it was always DNS

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Unwillingly is also fine with me.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Well, they have to.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Apple does love to take designs that makes their devices enter the realm of disposable tech. Like soldering storage and ram on their MacOS running devices in the name of speed, but one that is not noticeable to the average user. And decreases peoples ability to upgrade it to use even longer like they did the older macs.

So fighting against replaceable batteries seems along the line for them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve commented this elsewhere but it wouldn’t surprise me if they actually over engineer the replaceable battery and incorporate their MagSafe tech or something to make replacement batteries prohibitively expensive but technically follows EU rules. Seems like a very Apple malicious compliance outcome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They will though, at least in Europe. Otherwise they will lose that market entirely

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

One year ago I brought my PinePhone with replaceable battery into the sea and it's still working!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I could accept an adjustment where manufacturers only need to provide an option in the current generation, I.E. they need to sell iPhone 16s that have a replaceable battery, and an equivalent version that doesn't. The argument for waterproofing seems fair to me, so the best approach in my mind would be to give that choice to consumers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

tl;dr apple won't do that because it's special

load more comments
view more: next ›