moon_crush

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

Please. Climate change has been a well-lnown phenomena for a very long time. Scientists in the 19th century were warning that rising CO2 from human-caused emissions could harm the climate.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_climate_change_science

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I see no article here.

I agree with the general premise you present, but let’s be clear: there is a BIG difference between framing this example as “invading horde” and “migrants”. One of these, at least, aims to present an acceptably neutral term, while the other targets a more visceral and inflammatory response. Both sides are not the same.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Sidebar, Rule #1: Post only articles.

Please post your memes somewhere else

[–] [email protected] 103 points 1 year ago

Except that states have no fucking business telling someone what they can do with their body. “State’s rights” my ass! This is a “personal right”that was stolen.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Resign? Nah, the show is just about to get interesting!

That look on his face is exactly what would happen at the start of Quantum Leap. Grab some popcorn and see what historic wrong Dr. Samuel Beckett rights in this episode!

[–] [email protected] 139 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, emphatically YES!

There was a dramatic shift in tone from the Trump White House during the early COVID days once it was realized that the virus outbreak centered on urban areas.

And it was incredibly obvious to anybody paying attention.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

We can agree to disagree. “The Software” was delivered, source included. And you as end consumer are free to redistribute and maintain as you wish.

However, I cannot see any contract law judgement that would force continuation of a subscription model on the vendor (in perpetuity!) if they do not wish to remain under contract.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Best TL;DR yet!

A finer detail is that Swift was contractually prohibited from new recordings for two years after original contract ended — that time has now passed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›