njm1314

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Those are all absurd luxuries? Not luxuries but absurd luxuries?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well yeah, except now all they have to worry about is the rocket blowing up.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

There's literally tons of bots that post Reddit content on Lemmy. To the point that I get extremely annoyed at the vast number of them.

To say nothing all the people who scour Reddit for content to post here.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

I didn't realize there was even a competition. This is why they signed them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

I think we're all a little bit weary to be honest with you.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Some might argue that's the point of the church.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How do you define Direct? I'm open to a very wide range of it whether it's from going door to door all the way through throwing bombs into the carriage of a tsar. Action's fantastic particularly at local level, in fact primarily at the local level. Up to and including Carriage routes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yup. There it is. The path of fascism victory. Exactly what I've been saying. Thank you.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (9 children)

I didn't say you said it I said you were an example of it. Hell you just did it again, every 4 years you say. Exactly the issue. You people think it's a one-time game. It's not , it's constant. It's every Congressional race it's every senate race it's every state race it's every School Board Race. The fight is unending. Also yeah some people deserve fascism, they're called the people that sit on their ass and let it overwhelm them. People that aren't willing to fight it are the ones who deserve it. Cuz they're the ones that enable it more than anyone else.

I agree it takes groundwork, what kind of ground work is my question though. Real groundwork? The kind of groundwork that endorses democracy and respect for democracy? The kind of ground work that keeps progressively moving us away from fascism step by step? Yeah that's the kind of ground work we need. That's the kind of ground work you're sitting here arguing against. Your groundwork is vote one time in one election and then turn your nose up at the entire process and sabotage anyone who wants to keep fighting. You all or nothing people are the problem. When you're steering a nation it takes a long time for the rudder to move. It takes constant pressure to change course. That course change is going to take years and maybe even decades but you have to keep pushing on the rudder. If you never try you go where you were headed in the first place. That's what your endorsing here. One brief nudge and then sitting on your ass. Doesn't move anything.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (18 children)

This comment is the perfect example of why fascism has a habit of winning. Laziness from the populace. One election in one office is all you're willing to commit. We voted one time in one election, why wasn't that enough? One office wasn't run by a fascist and that's got to do it for the entire country for the rest of all time I guess. One vote is all you're willing to commit. People who don't understand fight against fascism is a lifetime of work are the people who deserve fascism. Beating fascism is about building a strong Democratic populace. About building a system and a society that respects the Democratic process. It takes decades and it has to be renewed constantly. Also wouldn't be a bad idea to just go around hanging fascist every 30 or 50 years or so either, that's also an option.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

So you're upset that the title of the article accurately describe the contents, is that right? Cuz what's your describing is absolutely what the title implied. It's not an article about the UK, it's an article about the US. They do not hide that in the least.

view more: ‹ prev next ›