[-] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

Intelligent, mature adults have done quite a lot of bad stuff, too. I would hate it if my child turned out to be a reincarnation of Adenoid Hynkel (great movie, definitely recommend, Charlie Chaplin was amazing) πŸ˜€

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Well, having children does change a person. For example, a man's testosterone levels drop substantially when he spends time around small children.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

This was a nice post to read 😊 I was never that interested in having children myself. People pushing others to adopt kids makes me somewhat think that they just want someone to suffer with them 🀣

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Hello πŸ™‚ I'm not sure if this is a fact but it seems that this childfree sublemmy is a bit more active now than it was when I started posting less than two weeks ago.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A rather short read, but a very relatable classic to my mind: The Wolf and the Seven Young Kids by Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm

Think of the wolf in that fairy tale as a childfree person trying to help the children to flee from their malicious breeder mother. Perhaps not too surprisingly, the wolf was blamed for everything and the breeder with her brainwashed children even pulled the plug on the wolf and celebrated its demise probably thinking that getting rid of that selfish hateful bigot of a childfree wolf was a virtue and that it was time to go and be fruitful and continue to never think the thought that rarely crosses anybody's mind: "Maybe I am the bad guy?"

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I'll tell some background on why I asked the original question.

I am using a setup where I have adjusted the amount of blue light emitted by my display to as low levels as I could from the interface accessible through the physical buttons in my display. My display is also set to be so dim that when some other people took a look at my display, they had a hard time seeing almost anything even at a good viewing angle.

I also have the night light feature set to as warm as possible on my Ubuntu Linux.

I can also easily control all other possible light sources in the place I am in, including blocking virtually any and all sunlight.

I do know that ambient lighting can be beneficial to the eyes, however. I solely came up with the original question out of curiosity and actual real life setting in mind.

The display I use does look like it is from the control panel of a submarine but that is not a problem to me as a programmer that uses no syntax highlighting as I see no need (or any positive effect from highlighting in my case: I wouldn't read a novel with different words in different colors; I find such features in editors distracting (and Vim or a similar editor without plugins tends to be pure bliss compared to IDEs)) to highlight syntax while programming; all the semantic information I need is in the source code text (i.e., without color data) itself (excluding e.g. colorForth when rendered the way that language is (AFAIK) typically rendered on the screen).

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I see your logic. Thanks πŸ‘

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Would you mind elaborating on your reasoning that lead you to the conclusion that my original question is circular? I am in no way claiming it isn't, I'd just like to see the reasoning.

27
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

What is the natural science reason to wear blue light eyeglasses instead of just turning one's computer display's blue lights off or very low in spaces where there are no other sources of blue light than the screen the person is watching? Suppose that the person has perfect visual acuity without eyeglasses. Suppose also that all other possible protective measures achieved by the blue light eyeglasses are achieved by other means, such as by using UV filtering eyeglasses of the same shape and frame material and frame color as the blue light eyeglasses assuming that the blue light eyeglasses do have such protection. Economic, ease of use, technical savviness, time needed to configure the display or other such reasons are out of scope of the question. Other situations where there is blue light are also out of scope just as the overall harm caused by blue light.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This is some good stuff. The punchline gave me an evil laugh πŸ˜† The childfree sublemmy never disappoints you.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I agree. It's like so many modern parents almost thought that their kids won't survive a moment without the parents being at close range to the kids. I have viewed quite a many different very old photos and paintings featuring a multitude of gentlemen and/or ladies at different festivities. The majority of those kinds of pictures that I have seen featured no children whatsoever. People at that time used to have more kids than modern parents on average, so I think the IMHO overly child-centered lifestyle of many modern parents is pretty silly. IMO parents should care for their kids but not worship them. The dinner party people's kids in the "good old days" survived with someone else looking after them; the world would be pretty much void of humans if they didn't survive, anyway.

4
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

So I won't hurt my toes while sleepwalking.

141
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Greetings from Finland! I got my vasectomy yesterday at the age of 30. Starting from that age a Finn can get sterilized with just the approval of the doctor that's going to perform that surgery. That procedure was a huge relief in my life. It may sound weird to some but I rejected all kinds of intimate interest from women (even though I am a hetero male) until this point in life mostly because I always, since childhood, had that nagging fear of procreating which is something I really want to avoid as one could see πŸ˜ƒ Girls must have kind of thought I just don't really like females or something 🀣 Temporary contraception to prevent pregnancy is too unreliable to me in my personal case; I don't want a relationship where I would constantly worry about contraception failing. The contraceptive items could break, I couldn't know for sure if a woman has used her contraceptives; and some female contraceptives would carry too big of a health risk to her (I just cannot tolerate those risks to my prospective lady but want to cherish her).

I'll just have to wait a few months to hopefully get a negative lab test to show there are no cells to create offspring in that stuff. Then I can finally start looking for a spouse without fear of pulling a trolley around the balcony later on. I have realized lately that a relationship usually just doesn't work (not all cases of all people are such, however) if one of the partners is a childfree-minded individual and the other is not. So I think the only way to find happiness and longevity with a spouse in my case is to find a partner who is sterilized, too. I just know of too many cases of a person telling to their not-willing-to-reproduce partner that they don't want kids, either, and after basically building their life together, telling to that partner that maybe a kid would be a good thing after all and then divorcing.

This surgery was one of the best things to happen to me ever. I am really happy with my decision. However, some very conservative religious relatives and other such people around me might give me some nagging and whining if they somehow find out that I got sterilized. I still have my Christian faith like I used to, I just won't make kids. Marriage is not meant to be a Victorian era "Shut your eyes tight and think of England" kind of thing, anyway πŸ˜ƒ

view more: next β€Ί

nokidding

joined 1 year ago