olimario

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I check more often than not if they're a co-op.

I dislike parasitic capitalists with ill-gotten wealth expanding it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I mean there are further reasons like:

"I will only purchase things where the laborers are contractually obligated to some or all share of the profits"

I'd never pirate a product from a worker co-op, charity, or artisan but everything else is fair game in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

My experience in US cities is that they are so poorly planned that I understand why people would view them negatively and think they're overrated.

Then when I graduated from college and moved overseas I got it because the design of cities was moreso for them to be livable spaces and communities than the mutated abomination that were the two US cities I spent most of my childhood in.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are some open world games you've previously enjoyed and what did you enjoy about them? Additionally what are some open world games you dropped/didn't enioy?

That's probably going to allow people to give you better recommendations for yay/nay.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That reminded me that at some point I ended up with a FF13 guide and, despite not living the game, really enjoying it.

I purchased an FFX guide when I was very young but unfortunately I remember it having coffee stains all throughout.

 

As a child I'd occasionally get videogame strategy guides at garage sales which largely fostered my long-term love of reading.

I'm sure others have similar stories so what were some of your favorite Brady/Prima/other strategy guides?

To start off for me:

  • Sonic Adventure 2 Battle
  • Jak 3
  • Knights of the Old Republic
  • Banjo-Kazooie

Jak 3 is probably my personal favorite as I remember liking the artwork/concept art a lot as well as blurbs written in-character.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Definitely a grumpy old man but that doesn't mean you aren't right.

Try telling people the same thing about how corporate consolidation is bad and is going to lead to long-term anti-consumer damage and they respond the same way largely.

The good news is the Lemmy community seems, as a whole, to have its head on its shoulders better about things like this.

I assume it's some combination of an older userbase, more tech literate, and people directly experiencing enshitification as the fundamental reason a large segment of the community migrated here.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Short of a constitutional convention that probably results in the balkanization of the United States I don't see how individuals manage to overthrow their corporate overlords and their bought government in the US.

Condolences to all of the people held hostage to vote for democrats on a harm-reduction line.

It's probably the correct play, but man do I feel for all of you.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The only additive feature that would make it my forever client is customizable multi-communities.

Let me choose to add [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], etc into a single multicom (that I can name) and display posts from all of them when I click on it.

It would be quite literally perfect for all of my browsing needs if it implemented this feature.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly.

The issue here, which you and I probably agree on, is you just need a license standard with an enforcement (regulation through legislation) mechanism.

Then it just comes down to "which service stack best delivers on this requirement" which likely wouldn't be in a Blockchain implementation's favor.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Beyond technological throughput constraints, I just genuinely don't want the real life commodificaiton of in-game resources.

I don't want a market existing around selling my virtual jacket in game, I don't want loan-terms from fake in-game banks backed by a real-life commodity determining the investment in my guild, I don't want to think about the macroeconomic impact of an expansion releasing and how that affects the value of my character.

If a crypto-game actually delivered on the above I bet it would have a playerbase (people who think Eve is too casual), but they're overwhelmingly crowd-funding/vc-funding cash grabs whose cypto-technological utility is usually less functional than that of the steam marketplace.

I recognize I'm someone who will never want to play a game that couples its virtual economy to the real-economy (and I think the overwhelming majority of players feel the same way).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is largely a reddit-discourse problem that evolved over time as the site devolved into witty one-liners and adversarial comments for engagement.

I'm hoping people push back hard against this across various fediverse instances because it just makes the internet a worse place and discourages contributions from would-be posters/commenters.

People should feel excited to post without feeling the need to look over their post/comment 100 times to pre-emptively guess what all attack angles someone is going to respond to in a post as harmless about liking the way roses smell.

view more: next ›