Isn't it weird the Republican nominees don't laugh like most people?I haven't watched much of Vance to notice this but since they're ragging on Harris for laughing I bet that's a big bullet point to avoid when he's in public.
orbitz
joined 1 year ago
That's Trump's secret, he's always entitled ... According to his extremely weird brain anyways.
Also isn't it pretty uncommon for someone to lose reelection for president but be the nominee the next one? Mean most know their official politics days are over at that point so the title isn't confusing.
Spoilers season 5 ep 1 Doctor Who (new series to be specific)just in case it's needed, couldn't figure out the spoiler formatting, yeah old but I wouldn't want to deprive anyone watching first time
First Matt Smith episode he basically scares off the aliens by saying 'you can figure out who I am, do you want to continue this?' ... And for some reason they run from the dude who never wants to touch a gun heh. To be fair he always tries talking until they leave him without peaceful options, which makes him an awesome hero.
As a neighbor to the US the amount of votes he receives is terrifying, I thought the general public was better but learned soon after COVID it was not. No need to worry about your fellow man if he's dead after all right? Like even if a party wanted to do most of his platform cough heritage foundation it'd at least be more palatable (to understand) than them wanting to vote in someone who wants to loot their treasury and just avoid jail....unless they're all criminals...huh.
I could go for a root beer.
I assume there's always a group of them for all popes or am I incorrect? Mean not necessarily the same people but someone must not like whichever one is current enough to form a group in the past.
Online these days it's like fishing in a barrel to find someone with your weird ideas so no digging needed there.
According to Wikipedia a candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win, if no one gets 270 votes then it goes to the other vote. All I'm saying is one avenue I've read about is they are trying to have enough people in place to ensure the Democratic candidate can't get the electoral votes to win to force the house to vote by not certifying their states's results.
I'm not saying it's likely or possible, that's beyond my knowledge of the process so I really have no clue, but that's slightly different than the VP not certifying the votes though it's the same end result.
I thought states needed to certify before it got to Congress? This would be not sending any results period so the VP isn't involved yet. Least that's my understanding.
I think one idea this time is to have enough states not certify the results to force a vote for president where each state gets a single vote. Since there are more Republican states they vote in Trump. Not sure what safeguards there are against states that decide not to certify even if they don't have proof, or what role courts play in that scenario.
view more: next ›
He punches down in his 'jokes', and laughs at other people's misery rather than when it's in good humour. How anyone can vote for a politician that can't laugh at themselves let alone a good joke is a mystery to me.