Version 1:
Version 2:
There's a significant impact from the higher temperatures.
It's not just the management history, though that doesn't help.
That's a very plausible claim, but difficult to prove
A fair-sized chunk of this fall's electorate was too young to vote in 2016, and doesn't have a real sense of how awful he is, or how much has deteriorated over the past few years.
A lot of people don't pay much attention until shortly before the election.
His age and mental capacity can weigh on folks when he can't give a decent explanation of what he's going to do on a particular topic.
Mental capacity.
He's very good at tossing out free association, and showing that he's in touch with the latest racist meme.
Anything else? Not so much.
Also, they'll borrow huge amounts of money so the handful of people making 10 million can pay 500k less in taxes.
The IRA is absolutely a bill which uses capitalist mechanisms to achieve some decarbonization.
I'd love to get rid of PG&E and have a publicly-owned utility instead, which doesn't charge the @#$@#% markup the PG&E gets to in order to pay an ever-increasing dividend.
Which is why lobsters have been shifting northward, with populations rising on the north edge of their range, and declining on the southern end.
Not exactly what we want humans to be forced to do.
They'd probably get less engagement if I did that; headlines that confuse people cause them to comment, which in turn causes Facebook and Reddit to show content to more people.
He'll spout words, likely ones which make it clear he's going to make good on his side of the oil industry's billion-dollar bribe.
Making that clear to people is likely a big deal