From up here you look this big
Ask them to do so themselves, voluntarily.
If they refuse, the argument stands.
If they accept, you won't convince this person.
You're missing the point. He did a bad thing. Yes. But punishing him for doing it doesn't undo the bad thing. Right now we have the chance to praise the good thing: switching sides.
What will get more blue votes: penalizing red votes after they're already cast, or extolling the virtues of voting blue, especially using cases of those who have seen the value of switching sides?
You're not wrong that his vote may have caused harm, but he has just as much right to cast it as you have to shun him for it. The real story here is that he learned and is now on a more productive side. We should be celebrating the future, not dwelling on past mistakes.
What did he get away with? He voted for a candidate he believed in. It was a poor choice from some perspectives, but he apparently knows that now and is advocating for the opposing side. Literal democracy at work.
We should reward this behavior. Punishing bad behavior only teaches people to get better at lying about it. Rewarding good behavior creates more of it.
Will punishing him cause Trump to lose the election he already won?
Building solutions is harder than casting blame, but it's also more important.
This argument is bad and you should feel bad
This is super rad
Totally, which is why I use Mull. I suppose I meant: what's great about Fennec or what's different between Fennec and Mull?
Mind listing some reasons? I'm a Mull user and very curious/interested.
Heavy Jawa breathing
Splendid experience. Favorite feature: manage DNS records via API.
Chicken?
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/14188217
I'm old, Gandalf. I know I don't look it, but I'm beginning to feel it in my heart.
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/10648308
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10594088
In a heartbeat
view more: next ›
If you think the sentiment applies to all cases, you're really missing the point.