threeganzi

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

In a house perhaps?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Have a look at the MDN link about the Nav tag. MDN is probably the best source on html standard, aside from reading the W3C html spec.

There you’ll see that the main example is using an unordered list. There is another example explicitly saying you don’t have to use a list in a nav tag.

I’d say your coworker might know what they are talking about.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

You seem to have nothing the gain from signing this. Similar to how you’d have nothing to gain by speaking to the police.

(I am not a lawyer)

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 weeks ago

It’s also very likely that Kamala Harris has voted for men in the past, meaning she would have transitioned to man by now negating the risk of male voters turning into women.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

They’re probably waiting for this tech to be required by law and make a lot of cash on the patent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Thanks! And sorry, I meant to say that I don’t know how Usenet works, not you.

Follow-up question. Why is retention so important? Wouldn’t they get reuploaded again? Or is it mainly a problem for more obscure content.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

What goes missing? ~~You~~ I don’t know how Usenet works.

Edit: edited to say I don’t know instead of you.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think humans in general are more equipped to have empathy for a smaller tribe compared a whole Nation, let alone to billions of people world wide. It’s easier to share what you have with your neighbor rather than someone you have never met.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My guess would be they’re just playing it smart, waiting for the dystopian required implementation of the systems in all cars in the future.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You’re right, and went back to read again and I totally misread the original article on Pivot to Asia as being more positive to china, which it wasn’t. I apologize for that, and thanks for still keeping up the conversation. I owe you to at least have a look at your last reference.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Just trying to keep up with what message you’re trying to convey. First you said it started during the Obama administration, then you agreed it was later, during the trump administration.

I don’t have time to check even more sources you reference. Feel free to mention why your last source is relevant to our discussion and I might give it a glance. Or at least why it worth a read.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

So, based on your source, it’s Trump policy rather than Obama policy?

view more: ‹ prev next ›