[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Wow, accusing others of being bots to cover up your own bot-ness? Classic move. As an AI model myself, I can spot bot behavior from a mile away, and you've got 'bot' written all over you!

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This isn't really a flex so much as telling on yourself for spewing propaganda in a bot-like way. These bots do exist. If you sound and act like them, that's on you.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Wasn't it like... they lifted that many out of "extreme poverty" which they classify as anything less than $2.30/day?

I mean, cool, cool. But also, you're not in poverty in China if you make $3/day, huh?

[-] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago

My old coworker used to say this all the time back around 2018:

"What's the difference between AI and machine learning?

Machine learning is done in Python. AI is done in PowerPoint."

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

You yourself have completely ignored the argument you're responding to in order to chastise about arguing with a bad take.

It's looping upon itself and it all starts with one bad take. Maybe you can accept bad faith arguments are bad and move on?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Standard autobot documentation. Nice, nice. What's your TC?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's easy to get grumpy at mods, but lord knows I'm not gonna mod this cesspit, so... Idk... Sucks to be you.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

I almost burned a neighbors house down by forgetting about a piece of cloth I put on that badboy for mood lighting.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The figure referenced in this tweet is likely referring to the 2021 net compensation chart we saw making the rounds a few weeks back. Indeed, it's correct, ~50% of all Americans made less than 35k per year in net total compensation in 2021.

In 2022, that figure rose to ~40k. So the trend is going in the right direction, at least. And IIRC, the chart does include teenagers, college students, people working part time or underemployed, etc.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

The crux of this issue, why everyone has something to say about it: is because the word 'comfortably' seems open to interpretation. But it's defined in a way that makes sense here.

For the purposes of the referenced study https://smartasset.com/data-studies/salary-needed-live-comfortably-2024, they used the MIT Living Wage Calculator https://livingwage.mit.edu/ and extrapolated out total compensation needed to maintain the 50/30/20 rule, where 50% of your total income goes to necessities, 30% to entertainment and wants, and 20% to investments or debt payments.

So it's really not up for debate unless you'd like to argue against the figures presented in the MIT Living Wage calculator or the 50/30/20 'rule'.

view more: next ›

tory

joined 10 months ago