And a random number generator is not random lol. And I never claimed copying an art style is a copyright violation, stop putting words in my mouth. God you people are so fucking annoying to argue with, making shit up, ignoring any points, you don't even understand how the thing works
turtletracks
joined 7 months ago
I wish you understood how AI worked lol. People who don't know how an AI works on a technical scale should not have opinions on whether or not it's copywritten
Yuzu was charging for early access to their emulator, which is what prompted Nintendo action.
Ryujinx doesn't seem like any legal action was taken, sounds like the creator was given a chunk of cash by Nintendo to take it down.
I hate Nintendo, but you gotta keep the facts straight
The only time the emulators are targeted is when the creators try to profit off them, or am I mistaken?
Because an AI does not create unique art/concepts/ideas, what's hard to understand about that? You are putting the human mind on the same level as AI and that's wild
"I've had no issues, therefore issues don't exist"
Computers do not get "inspiration" or "influence", and that's quite literally not what I'm arguing. Maybe I'm just talking to an AI lol
What's the equivalence you're trying to make? The program itself may be open source, but the images the model's been trained on are copywritten.
And if you personally hand made it, sure. By nature, nothing an LLM makes is "completely original"
Oh god...
If your AI was trained entirely off work you had the rights to, sure. But it was not.
If Hunter is so bad, wait til he hears about Trump's children