this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
270 points (86.1% liked)

Political Memes

5232 readers
1432 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You’re spot on about the relativity, but there is an objective spectrum as well.

Right is about consolidating power; Left is about ensuring it is shared.

The extreme right is authoritarian. Any support for (or tolerance of) the consolidation of power and/or wealth is rightist.

The extreme left is egalitarian. Support for systems of shared power and/or wealth (and mechanisms for prevention of hoarding or entrenchment of either) is leftist.

So while you are correct about the relative positions to one another, it’s important to point out that, objectively, neither liberals nor tankies are leftist in any way, shape, or form.

Also, the spectrum isn’t a straight line, but a complex web. For example, just consider the “extremes”…

Extreme right power structures include monarchy, oligarchy, dictatorship, feudalism, etc. Because the nature of rightism is consolidation, those structures tend to look similar.

“Extreme” left power structures include direct democracy, communism (stateless), anarchism (which itself includes many flavors and definitions), and the like.

Since tankies openly advocate for consolidation of power, they are objectively far-right. Liberals will tolerate (sometimes even champion) the consolidation of wealth & power even if it destroys liberalism… because to them the means is more important the ends; ergo, they are slight right.

Humans being humans, there will always be “rightward pressure” on any social construct. Leftists need to recognize this and ensure than any leftist progress can withstand such pressure and avoid rightward drift. This is why liberals are so often despised by leftists… liberals seem leftist only to those so far on the right that they can’t see over the metaphorical moderate/centrist horizon. Likewise, tankies seem leftist to the same at first glance, because they advocate for more benevolent use of totalitarianism… but each ignores the objective spectrum… consolidation of wealth/power vs evenly shared wealth/power.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You understand that I never suggested that liberals are left-wing and that was the entire point of my explanation?

There's nothing stated here that I didn't already know.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I’m not disagreeing, I’m just building on what you said. ❤️

There’s a surprising number of people - especially in the US, that genuinely think that liberals are leftist… and not just leftist, but “radical left.”

They will also take tankies at their word that tankies are leftist, never mind the definitions.

I’m just expounding on what you said for bystanders, really. Sending good vibes your way, internet friend.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, yesterday was a bit rough for me. 🙂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Been there. Hope you’re feeling better, today!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure they were disagreeing with you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I was passing out when I made the comment. What I really want to know is why why this entire thread is being downvoted to hell. Is it several tankies or just 1 with multiple accounts?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm one of the "tankies" downvoting the thread, but I just have the one account. You said something obviously wrong and the other person somehow managed to disagree with you while saying essentially the exact same wrong thing. It seemed like a pointless argument about nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Correct. But they like to pretend they are. The amount of mental gymnastics and Newspeak they need to get there is truly profound.

“We are leftist because OUR totalitarianism is benevolent!”

Like… that is not the way it works. That is now how any of this works. 🤣

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, that is the obviously wrong thing you both said.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh no, the authoritarian rightists fee-fees got hurt because us nasty lefties won’t let them get away with Ur-fascist Newspeak!

So sorry… well, not really.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

I have no idea what you're even talking about at this point.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The anti-authoritarians demand that the political state be abolished at one stroke, even before the social conditions that gave birth to it have been destroyed. They demand that the first act of the social revolution shall be the abolition of authority. Have these gentlemen ever seen a revolution? A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon — authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionists. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if it had not made use of this authority of the armed people against the bourgeois?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And your point is? If it’s that rightist means inevitably have rightist ends, that is correct. Thankfully, possibility is infinite, and not restricted to the false-choice of a binary fallacy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Is the use of force inherently rightist, in your mind, regardless of why it's used?