news

23360 readers

747 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

130

Biden’s poor polling numbers have raised questions about the possibility of a blowout victory by Trump in November (thehill.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

112 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 78 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Turns out doing literal genocide and paying for it with record high prices on food and housing is a losing strategy. Who could have guessed

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

ok but have you considered that trump would call the genocide he's unconditionally arming extremely very good instead of calling the genocide he's unconditionally arming very very good?? checkmate tankkkies

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I still can't believe political discourse in this shithole country got to the point where "Ok yes, our candidate is committing genocide, but have you considered the OTHER GUY would also do genocide (and like it more)?" is a literal line of thought but here we are

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I'm digging and I can't find a perfect analogue yet but I bet there was something similar happening in 1828 between Jackson and J.Q. Adams

While initially ambivalent, Adams took great interest in the Creek Indians of Georgia who were being pressured by the state’s governor, George Troup, to give up their lands.

After receiving a delegation of Creeks in the capital, Adams intervened and demanded that Troup give the Indians a fairer deal for their lands, leading to the 1826 Treaty of Washington. This treaty was agreed upon between Adams and Creek leaders in Washington DC, a stark departure from previous Native American treaties which were often one-sided.

Unfortunately, this was to be but a temporary victory for the Creeks. Troup quickly organised another treaty to take the rest of the Creek lands and, while Adams threatened federal intervention against Georgia, he backed down due to fears of this incident sparking a civil war.

While Adams was ineffective in halting the march towards the calamitous Indian Removal of the 1830s, he became a strong and active critic of US Indian affairs for the rest of his life.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But with Trump we'd have two genocides, maybe even three. smuglord

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

With Trump food prices wouldn't even exist because we wouldn't have food. Trump will literally delete the existence of food from America if he is president that's just the fact

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Trump will literally delete ~~the existence of food from~~ America

ooooooooooooooh

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

And telling his own voters that it's not a genocide and then gaslighting them with the classic "Trump would do an even worse genocide" like what the fuck