Art

640 readers

6 users here now

This is a community for art in any medium. Welcome!

Rules:

This is a community to discuss all things related to art. Posts should be relevant to art, such as sharing art or news about art. To clarify, when we say "any medium," this includes media such as painting, film, music, literature, performance, video games, etc.
Keep things civil. Critiquing art is fine but attacking other users for their opinions is not.
Avoid excessive self-promotion. Yes, this is subjective and will be based on how popular this community becomes overall. If you can see a post about your own work on the first few pages, don't post another.
Follow site-wide rules

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

152

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I was guessing the movie was Superman Returns, just because of how ironic it would have been.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The article says it was a canceled JJ Abrams movie called "Superman: Fly-by"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's about the level of creativity I expect from abrams. "See Superman flys, so the movie is called fly by! It's evocative!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Lol and here I was picturing Superman with an uzi doing a drive-by while flying

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Flyboy*

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That's what I was thinking... 2001 to 2003? Being gay didn't seem to hurt Bryan Singer... X-Men was 2000. X2 was 2003.

Singer left the franchise to do Superman Returns in 2006.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

behind the camera vs front of the camera?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Well, Singer was behind the camera, but he also came up with the most homoerotic looking Superman:

I think it's the smaller shield and boyshorts.

Compared with:

or the new guy:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I mean, that was a different studio and media company... easily possibly that Warner had a homophobic manager up in the food chain while Fox did not

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Can you explain why?

I tried looking but I'm not sure what it is am looking for and there was A LOT of new articles about its event.