this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
142 points (96.7% liked)

News

22626 readers
3628 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Kavanaugh said in dissent that the court’s decision will have a “devastating” impact on thousands of victims of the opioid epidemic.

"As a result, opioid victims are now deprived of the substantial monetary recovery that they long fought for and finally secured after years of litigation,” he wrote in the dissent, which was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

It's important to note that in historical examples of these settlements, the money was us d as a slush fund.

When tobacco did their settlement, it was used for stuff like schools and toads, then taxes were cut instead. Resulting in no increase in funding then when the settlement money ran out, they were broke. In some cases the settlement money was even used to pay for tobacco infrastructure (auction houses and such).

Can't remember if it was Oliver or Stewart, but one of them did a show/segment on it recently.

And that's not even getting into the settlement didn't touch any of the Sacker money directly.

And the company 100% knew that extended release wouldn't work the same on everyone, some people would be pretty much guaranteed to become addicts if they followed their prescriptions. They'd just naturally metabolize it too fast.

But they made more money. So they pushed XR to doctors and patients while hiding the fact that it was dangerous.

They need to be in jail, which won't happen. But we can at least fuck their personal blood money up.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the money was us d as a slush fund.

NOW WE ARE TALKING

Mullah Kavanaugh's logic has no merit, he knows it and anyone with half a brain also knows this.

The whole write was the news headlines to make majority seem like the assholes... pathetic Mullah Kavanaugh

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But why are the liberal justices falling for it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

liberal justices

That sound everyone just heard was the Overton window flying by....

We have far right fascists justices and pro corporation "moderate" justices.

Neither are going to pick people over corporations often when it matters.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

liberal justices

Mullahs are not liberal in any sense of the word lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Kagan, Jackson, Sotomayor are usually referred to as the liberal justices, aren't they? Not sure whatchu getting at?

Also, why are you referring to them as Mullahs, they're not religious teachers, any of them

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

labeling as them as liberal makes them seem like they are on "liberal" team whatever that means.

Mullahs are the owner class team.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you honestly believe folks like Jackson are equivalent to people like Thomas/Alito beyond their legal pedigree? You think she wants what they do?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

i think peasants' worship of the mullahs is a futile exercise similar to watching young bucks in tights throwing a pig skin around.

I was always more a LeBron guy myself tho!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't worship them I simply get surprised time to time altho maybe I should read their full dissents to get a better idea

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I see, well i did not read the case but sounds like majority took the side that you can't waive criminal liability via a settlement you are not even a party too lol

which sounds right

dissent decided to cry over money poor drug addicts won't get when in reality that money was not going to the plebs anyway. does not sound like a legal argument nor is it even coached in reality.

so for who took which side... mehh, they collude on who takes what side for "optics"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

It was Oliver.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

XR/Extended Release

I'm very surprised the pharmaceutical market hasn't produced the opioid analogue to Vyvanse requiring enzymatic conversion as opposed to mechanical release -> long lasting natural extended release mechanism. Its a great idea that hasn't seemed to expand to many other therapeutic agents

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know vyvanse xr method of action off the top of my head...

But for opioids the difference in in enzymatic breakdown is already problematic.

Even for non XR, some people just burn thru it at different rates.

Personally I don't have enough of a couple of the L enzymes and that means most opioids barely do anything to me. Some people have too much and will burn thru a Vicodin in half as much time, leaving them unmedicated for half the time.

There's just too much human variation for a one sized fits all approach.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The point I'm making is, while I'm aware of people being fast or slow metabolizers, that should only factor in when it comes to active ingredient that is fully mechanically released and available for metabolism.

It cannot metabolize that which has not either been a) mechanically released or b) that which is pharmacodynamically inertt since it requires cleaving off the other binding substance (like l-lysine in Vyvanse) before the underlying active drug can be mechanically available to metabolize if that makes sense.

Vyvanse cannot be injected or administered in basically any other ROA than oral like normal dex because it (lis-dexamferamine—not dextroamphetamine) is inert until it has undergone the uncleaving of lysine from the active drug. Doesn't matter how fast one metabolizes dextro, nobody metabolizes lis as a straight stimulant, it is inert until made not so thru the blood or whatever.

Also, doesn't that mostly apply to codeine and morphine, wasn't aware of that extending to oxy and hydro?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Also, doesn’t that mostly apply to codeine and morphine, wasn’t aware of that extending to oxy and hydro?

Morphine (not sure about codeine) are/is one of the few options that are direct acting.

Oxy, Vicodin, and all the rest first get broken down I to an active metobalite. Even if they're not XR. XR just compounds the issue

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think there is likely to still be just as large of a personal variance in the rate that lisdexamphetamine is cleaved into the active metabolite, so the same problem arises.

I think anything that delays the active metabolite from taking effect technically dampens the addictive potential; the longer the better. I also think it's unlikely to really solve the problem though tbh. People can still tell what's causing how they feel when they start a new medication.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're never gonna fully attnuate all the edge cases and it doesn't really matter that some people end up being "allergic" or oversensitive or undersensitive to it. Thats what titration and medical supervision are for, not everything works for everyone.

Thats why choice and second/third/fourth line etc treatments exist. I sometimes do wonder if you did a double blind with folks and didn't tell them, I would conjecture the hyper-extended nature of such things if that were so established could be sufficient to mitigate for individual differences in metabolic-polymorphism or whatever