68
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

The idea that untouched nature progresses toward some idealized equilibrium isn't true, unfortunately. Conservation takes work. It has always taken work. It took work even when this land was solely occupied by indigenous people. We're already in the game and just withdrawing isn't an option.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Life on Earth existed for hundreds of millions of years before human industrialisation, why are we so necessary to it's continuation? Why isn't withdrawing to a certain extent an option? Sounds like you're arguing for the contradiction of infinite growth like a good capitalist.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Hmm, comrade I think the other commentor is a bit rude, and your 'name-calling' or rather insinuations by using similies is also a bit uncalled for.

By similie I am referring to, the use of "...infinite growth like a good capitalist"

It doesn't really seem fair to me to levy a claim like that or make that inference since nothing the other commentor said really–to me at least–indicates them advocating for infinite growth.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I am not even going to respond other than to say your arguments are so dumb, like for real.

like a good capitalist

you probably stack rocks

colonizer-brained

seriously, just shut up.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Thank you, this was helpfully thought-terminating.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

like your shit arguments had any thoughts to begin with

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

news

23240 readers
540 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS